Showing posts with label Stalked Women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stalked Women. Show all posts

More stupidity from the courts concerning #CyberStalking

Labels: » » » » » » » » » »
Media_httpuploadwikim_fhhwj
As (Volokh) noted last year, a federal prosecutor indicted a man for his campaign of insulting Twitter messages about a Buddhist religious leader, and a federal judge then dismissed the indictment on First Amendment grounds.
Some of the Twitter posts might have been seen as threatening, but the government’s theory wasn’t that they were threatening, but that they where posted “with the intent to harass and cause substantial emotional distress to” the religious leader, and actual caused such distress, in violation of the federal antistalking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. The district court correctly held that the statute was unconstitutional as applied, and left open the possibility that it might be unconstitutional on its face as well. The government appealed, but earlier this month decided to drop the appeal.
Now the Senate, rather than tightening the law to prevent its being applied to constitutionally protected speech, is considering expanding it. Section 107 of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2011 (which (Volokh) blogged about below, as to a different constitutionally troublesome provision) would take the existing statute and have it cover not just speech that causes substantial emotional distress, but also speech that “attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress,” so long as the speaker is intending to (among other things) “harass” the target. Anyone who
with the intent to … harass … uses the … any interactive computer service … to engage in a course of conduct that … causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to [the person or the person's family member]
would now be committing a federal crime. If the statute were just limited to conduct and speech intended to threaten someone — which the rest of the statute does cover — there would be no constitutional problem. But trying to outlaw speech that is made “with the intent to … harass” and “would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress” often violates the First Amendment, as the federal judge rightly held in the Twitter case. It seems to me that Congress should be fixing this constitutional problem rather than expanding it.
This is fascism. plain and simple. proving a person has intent to upset another person is no reason to take their free expression away. I have experience with this kind of legal abuse. I'm not allowed to tell you about it apparently... or rather I'd rather not find out how stupid the legal system is again.

Cyberbully and Cyberstalker Loren Feldman 1938Media, Hackers, GoDaddy and MediaTemple are still Cybersquatting, Cyberbullying and Cyberstalking. Hacker and so called Successful Women Involved

Labels: » » » » » » » » » » » » »
Scary when puppeteers give psychiatric advice

...the enraged reaction shows that this certainly registered an emotional response...

...This was what was seen on Noah David Simon dot com on Wednesday September 23rd 2009. GoDaddy was warned that Loren Feldman was Cybersquatting and Harassing with bigotry and continues to promote his hate speech. ...here is an example of the harassing messages Loren Feldman sends to me from the domain name he is stealing and defaming. This is not parody. this is harassment....
Godaddy_it_was_agreed between us that noahdavidsimon.com should not be on your servers at which time you wrongly switched the server to "MediaTemple". I contacted your organization about 6 months ago about a man who is cybersquatting my name and business and is sending harrassing and at times Anti-Semitic messages from my own rightfull domain name ( this was witnessed by the Jewish Internet Defense Force and also many members of the Jewish online community. http://twitter.com/JIDF/statuses/3680124281 ) here is the icann report. Loren Feldman 1938media.com ICANN Abuse | Cairo cai.icann.org
Here is a another video of Loren Feldman harassing Igor Berger and buying his name as well as mine. Please allow me to buy my own name. What you are doing with the cybersquatting is enabling Anti-Semitism by allowing Loren Feldman to broadcast his bigotry from my name and business name. It should not take a legal team for you to do the right thing. Noah Madieros of your company suggested I take this action, but I am hoping that in light that Loren Feldman is breaking the law and is harassing the Jewish community through Anti-Semitic jokes from the domain, that action should be taken because of principle. I am also sending a copy of this email to Jewish Groups like the JIDF [PROOF] cordially, NoahDavidSimon ...This was the original beef that I had with Loren Feldman. he defended a Hiemietown joke on Strumpette known as @AmandaChapel on twitter that I complained about. I had the Amanda Chapel name on facebook destroyed because it isn't an actual person. @AmandaChapel is really a man named Brian Connolly who tried to frame myself "Noah" for rape. Strumpette is BrianConnolly's blog.




backup: The data contained in GoDaddy.com, Inc.'s WhoIs database,Registrant: 1938 Media Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: NOAHDAVIDSIMON.COM Domain servers in listed order: NS1.MEDIATEMPLE.NET NS2.MEDIATEMPLE.NET

Loren Feldman 1938media.com ICANN Abuse

Loren Feldman is a Cyberbully who abuses ICANN policy against Anticybersquating. See the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. Loren Feldman abuses people on the Internet by hateful attack on them via his website and domain names of his victims. Some of the prominent web people that he attacked are Dave Winer, Robert Scoble, Jason Calacanis, and Shel Israel (Loren Feldman bought and registered www.shelisrael.com with GoDaddy.com), so GoDaddy was aware of his behavior before they allowed him to by Noah and Igor's property. Loren Feldman attacked and made fun of Shel Israel via a Puppet parody, both on 1938media.com and Shelisrael.com ...Because Noah David Simon and Igor Berger stood up to Loren Feldman and alerted the Internet Social Media community of his Cyberbullying, he started attacking. He registered Noahdavidsimon.com and Igorberger.com with Godaddy.com (Loren Feldman stated in his Ustream live video that he will use the sites for parody to attack) He even said that on Igor's domain that he will make fun of Igor's dead mother who passed away a month before Igor's and Noah's name was bought. Here are the videos where he claims to have bought the domain in order to terrorize. Loren Feldman's video message to Noah David Simon and Loren Feldman's video message to Igor Berger These videos were originally posted by Loren Feldman on seesmic. Igor download the videos from Seesmic and uploaded them to his Youtube account as evidence. Noahdavidsimon.com is registered by 1938media Loren Felman. @salzano Corey Salzano bought Igorberger.com with Loren Feldman. He works together with Loren Feldman @1938media Loren Feldman in his Ustream live video asked Corey Salzano to buy Igorberger.com then he in Seesmic video said Loren Feldman of owned Igorberger.com
Salzano and Feldman's relationship was recorded on Twitter. Whois record of Igorberger.com registrant is Salzano. Loren Feldman Tweeted and tormented Igor about his dead mother in a video right after his mother died by threatening to speak Latin Curses on his name by buying Igor's and Noah's intellectual property. Loren Feldman gloated on Twitter over getting the domain name. Corey Salzano admited he and Loren bought these domain to terrorize. Loren Feldman and Corey Salzano must return these domains to the registrar because as per Anticybersquating he cannot use these domains of other people names to profit from. Loren Feldman promotes his brand 1938media through the domains he Cybersquates on.

Bonobo society is, not only female-centered but also appears to be female-dominated.

Labels: » » » » » » » » » » » » » » »
In a primate
where there is no monogamy
the burden of raising children
is on the women. 
What does that tell you
about single mothers?

there are no indications that bonobos form
humanlike nuclear families. 
The burden of raising offspring appears
to rest entirely on the female's shoulders.
In fact, nuclear families are probably incompatible
with the diverse use of sex found in bonobos.
If our ancestors started out with a sex life
similar to that of bonobos,
the evolution of the family
would have required dramatic change.


Democratic Party Explained!
"It does seem to be relatively
widespread in primates
(we have a paper just out online in
International Journal of Primatology
showing it occurs in
wild golden-backed uacaris),"
biologist Gareth Jones
of the University of Bristol in England
wrote in an e-mail to LiveScience.
"The exciting thing is that scientists are now
exploring potential evolutionary reasons
for its occurrence."
Besides uacaris, masturbatory
behavior has been
studied in rhesus monkeys,
gray-cheeked mangabeys monkeys,
colobus monkeys,
Japanese macaques and other animals.
"It does seem to be relatively
widespread in primates
(we have a paper just out online in
International Journal of Primatology
showing it occurs in
wild golden-backed uacaris),"
biologist Gareth Jones of the
University of Bristol in England
wrote in an e-mail to livescience.com
"The exciting thing...
is that scientists are now exploring
potential evolutionary reasons
for its occurrence."
Besides uacaris,
masturbatory behavior
has been
studied in
rhesus monkeys,
gray-cheeked mangabeys monkeys,
colobus monkeys,
Japanese macaques
and other animals.
via
noahdavidsimon's posterous










................Here is some background into the researcher:
My own interest in bonobos came not from an inherent
fascination with their charms but from research on
aggressive behavior in primates. I was particularly
intrigued with the aftermath of conflict. After two
chimpanzees have fought, for instance, they may come
together for a hug and mouth-to-mouth kiss. Assuming that
such reunions serve to restore peace and harmony, I labeled
them reconciliations.

Any species that combines close bonds with a potential for
conflict needs such conciliatory mechanisms. Thinking how much faster marriages would break up if people had no way of compensating for hurting each other, I set out to investigate such mechanisms in several primates, including
bonobos. Although I expected to see peacemaking in these apes, too, I was little prepared for the form it would take.
sexual activity is the bonobo's
answer to avoiding conflict.
If a male bonobo tried to harass a female, all females would band together to chase him off. Because females appeared more successful in dominating males when they were together than on their own, their close association and frequent genital rubbing may represent an alliance. Females may bond so as to outcompete members of the individually stronger sex.  via songweaver.com
the reason is because the females want power.  right? 
is it all right to ask that question? 





Cyber Bullies and Hackers Targeting Successful Women?

Labels: » » » » » » » » » »
Photobucket

women are more likely to be Cyberbullies!
|
Lori Drew a.k.a. "Josh Evans" on the witness stand
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress



  


a man (Loren Feldman) who is cybersquatting  my name and business and is sending harassing and at times Anti-Semitic messages from my own rightful domain name ( this was witnessed by the Jewish Internet Defense Force and also many members of the Jewish online community. http://twitter.com/JIDF/statuses/3680124281

WIPO: Cybersquatting Hits Record

Picture_10_3

The number of cybersquatting complaints reached a record in 2008, the World Intellectual Property Association reported Monday.
Geneva-based WIPO, which is charged with resolving such disputes, said there were 2,329 complaints filed with the WIPO Administration and Mediation Center last year. That’s an 8 percent increase from the year prior.
And the numbers are likely to skyrocket as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers is expected to launch new top-domain spaces by year’s end.
"Cybersquatting remains a serious issue for trademark holders. Supported especially by registrar and registry stakeholders, the sale and broad expansion of new top-level domains in the open market, if not properly managed, will provide abundant opportunities for cybersquatters to seize old ground in new domains," Francis Gurry, WIPO’s general director, said in a statement.
In the last decade, when the WIPO commenced the dispute process, there have been 14,663 cybersquatting case covering 26,262 domains.
The WIPO said 30 percent of all cases were settled prior to decision. About 85 percent of the cases favored those filing the complaint.
that isn't to say that some men don't bully....


Photobucket

Protest Iran

Labels: » » » » » » » » » »
Femen went topless at an event at the Iranian embassy to protest the sentence of death by stoning that Iran meted out to Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani. Few things attract attention like a group of topless women. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was tortured for two days before she agreed to confess on TV, Her lawyer said. Feminists should be at the barricades over this issue....but they are not, the Femen stepped in. via avideditor.wordpress.com




heard @Seesmic Video died. I had to Save @ReblogGirl

Labels: » » » » » » » » » »
so @ReBlogGirl starts saying on Seesmic that she was going to break up with the social network and then goes on to describe what she was looking for in a relationship. a few people took her seriously. she obviously was giving them a paradox. Any woman who says she isn't looking for money and power, but just a good time is lying. Obviously the power to not know about money is asking to be protected old school style. She isn't looking to rule the world. she is looking for some guy to do it for her.... and one guy seemed to be giving a lecture on controlling her libido. Network of AntiZionists for the most part... but they had some interesting moments. French flavored Social Media. This guy was unfortunately from Delaware... where everyone is a kook. They even have Republican Wichans there. This guy was a Communist however.


I wish we could. really I do... but I'd rather not. ruling the world is no way to get power long term.  obviously property is libidinal. too much of a display of that and you lose your backyard and your wife goes with the swing set.





While Feminists attack Men in the United States, check out the NUTS in Iran friendly Brazil

Labels: » » »
Study: In Brazil, 10 women killed daily in domestic violence - CNN.com
41,532 women were murdered in Brazil between 1997 and 2007.
Samudio (photo right) was drugged, beaten, then strangled to death and her body mutilated. Some parts were fed to dogs and her last remains buried under concrete. It is claimed Bruno ordered and witnessed her death. The crime was later pieced together after police interviews with a then unnamed teenager after a forensic search revealed specks of blood in Bruno’s car. A 17 year old cousin of Bruno’s was later disclosed as being Romao’s partner in crime.

She Gave Great Head

Labels: » » » »















The Last Temptation of Ruth

Labels: » » » »
















A play in one act
Written for the stage by

N()AH
DAVID
SIMON







Unemployment now leads to
the Death of the Dead.
Death becomes wrong.
The dead have no right.
No longer does death order,
The sacrifice of ones function.
The permanently unemployed are dead.
The order of the male will die.
An Androgynous world is a mass murder
with true equality.
Gender becomes unemployed.
-----------------------------------
Ruth walks down an urban upper middle class street. It is cloudy and there is a slight breeze. It is the middle of winter and the weather has warmed for a frivolous calm. Bezelbub walks down the street.

(Bezelbub smiles to HIMSELF.)

Bezelbub

Ruth

Ruth

How did you know my name?

Bezelbub

If I want to know your name, then I know your name.

Ruth

(SHAKING HER HEAD IN THE NO POSITION.)

uh-uh

(SHAKES HER HEAD LEFT TO RIGHT AGAIN)

uh no, I think not Rumplestilskin.

Bezelbub

You don't know what you want.

Ruth

I don't want you.

Bezelbub

You already have me.

Ruth

I have pain. That is true.

Bezelbub

We have each other.

Ruth

You don't have me. Nobody has me.

Bezelbub

I get what I want. I have complete control.

Ruth

You don't have control over anything, not even control over your self.

Bezelbub

I will control.

Ruth

Your control?

Bezelbub

see this dollar?

Ruth

mmm-hmmm

Bezelbub

I will put this dollar on the ground. Like this.

Ruth

(cynically)

a magic trick.

Bezelbub

Nobody likes a skeptic

Ruth

do your trick.

Bezelbub

I am going to make the dollar move without touching it.

Ruth

I see

Bezelbub

Are you Ready?

Ruth

Yes, go ahead

Bezelbub

Make sure you are watching carefully.

Ruth

I'm watching. I'm watching.

(They both stare at the DOLLAR for 15 seconds. Nothing happens)

Ruth

Nothing happened.

(Bezelbub Smiles)

Ruth

Nothing happened. Nothing at all.

(RUTH GOES TO PICK UP THE DOLLAR. SHE PUTS THE DOLLAR IN HER POCKET)

Ruth

Thanks for the dollar!

Bezelbub

You see, it moved.

(Bezelbub SMILES)

Bezelbub

I did tell you. I control everything.

Ruth

You didn't make it move. I moved it.

Bezelbub

I made you move it.

Ruth

no

Bezelbub

I just did. I control you and I can oppress you..

Ruth

How can you oppress me?

Bezelbub

If it isn't me, then it is somebody else. Wherever you go. You will be oppressed. There is no escape. It is only through me that you can find freedom.

Ruth

Oh really. How do you offer freedom?

Bezelbub

I offer what some might call love. I offer understanding. I offer a mutual relationship of cooperation. I offer pleasure.

Ruth

Now the devil offers love!

Bezelbub

Love?

Another Abstract manifestation,



Ruth

who is the skeptic now?

Bezelbub

Water that is too pure

has no fish. You abuse the word love, so I don't believe in it.

Ruth

You're not evil. You're ignorant.

Bezelbub

I offer pleasure. I offer freedom. I offer you the ability to do what you want.

Ruth

You offer stupidity.

Bezelbub

I offer the ability to escape from the burdens of society and live for you. I offer autonomy. I can do anything I want and so could you if you cooperate.

Ruth

are you threatening me? I don't have to listen to this. Why should I trust you. Maybe you're just getting off. Is that what your doing? You're crossing the line.

Bezelbub

I'm telling you that I could. I didn't say I would!

Ruth

Would what?

Bezelbub

Anything I want

Ruth

You can't always get what you want. You might find that your actions have consequence.

Bezelbub

I decide my own consequence.

Some struggle with a way.

Some struggle with no way.

Ruth

You must have had a healthy normal family life.



Bezelbub

If you're so afraid of me then why are you talking to me?

(Pause)

Bezelbub

Well?

Ruth

I'm trying to be polite. People are watching and I don't want you to make a scene.

Bezelbub

Why are woman always doing what is socially sanctioned? All a woman desires is sensitivity from others, they don't need a man to make them happy.

Ruth

You don't really think that, do you? I know plenty of women who like sex with men.

Bezelbub

For women, sex is like cigarettes, coffee, or alcohol. They develop a taste for it and then they become addicted.

Ruth

I've had sex with men.

Bezelbub

I don't doubt you. The women I know don't even seem to get aroused by men until after their first experience. Once a woman has a heterosexual moment then a woman might develop a taste for it.

Ruth

Sex is a scary.

Bezelbub

It's not quite as scary for men. Most women have to be talked into sex their first time. You know what the world would be like without men? A bunch of obese and content butch lesbians.

Ruth

Woman have more at stake then men. It's not that they can't enjoy sex, it's simply that they are given a huge neurosis about it because they are the ones that could be pregnant.

Bezelbub

Rarely do women contemplate copulation without the children factor, because they have more at risk in pregnancy. Nine months of work is a bigger investment then a quick ejaculation.

Ruth

Is that fair?

Bezelbub

Life isn't fair for men either. People choose sexual partners based on their populaces social pressures and their own sexual cravings, but usually only women fear the direct biological result.

Ruth

Maybe it is time for men to start worrying.

Bezelbub

Oh, men are worried now. Believe me it is nothing to wish for. Sex is dangerous for us all now, but mostly women fear sexual anarchy because it would allow every one to be unmonogamous.

Ruth

Monogamy protects women from being cheated. It protects men too.

Bezelbub

Yes, men can lose. But, like you said, men can't become pregnant. You resent the fact that Bill Clinton cheated on Hillary, because it sets a precedent of sex without responsibility for men.

Ruth

I'm sorry, but sex without responsibility is not a good thing.

Bezelbub

You would think advances in birth control would make that phobia goes away. Men have to go out and earn a living while many women sit home and contemplate their newfound choices. Do you still think all men are given unlimited freedoms?

Ruth

but, your saying women are more likely to be gay by nature? A huge generalization!

Bezelbub

Your consider yourself gay, right?

Ruth

You're crossing the line.

Bezelbub

A good generalization usually has exquisite truths in it that are correct more times then not. Reality itself exists only through generalization. To understand our existence and to operate in it we must generalize. I have generalized... but truth itself is a generalization.

Ruth

Your generalizations are in the mold of an eighteenth century sexist.

Bezelbub

So now I am in the eighteenth century? Is there an exquisite difference between the eighteenth century and now? Certainly women haven't changed! Women are comprised of the same flesh today as they were yesterday. What has changed?

Ruth

Our roles have changed. Our perceptions of each other based on what is between our legs are different.

Bezelbub

Nothing has changed. The benefits and expenses of gender roles are still here and they are not going away.

Ruth

That's because of you.

Bezelbub

No, it is because of you. Women tend desire for some kind of moral system, to control. You secretly desire a feminist hierarchy, like an intimidating boyfriend. Something to tell us what to do.

Ruth

I don't want anyone to tell me what to do.

Bezelbub

Of course not. You want to control the boyfriend. Since you can't completely control a man you are replacing him with political correctness. speaking of that oppressive boyfriend. Rape: Isn't it odd how some woman enjoy the feeling of being victims. The ecstasy of being aware that a man was so needful that he broke his own morals. I have no moral values. You can't break me.

Ruth

That is your mistake. You think we want to be controlled.

Bezelbub

Passive men are seen as weak to the opposite sex and therefor not worthy of copulation and progeny. I am not passive. For women one's mate is seen as a gamble. A man who is strong enough to perform a violent sexual act is arousing for a woman because it proves a man's autonomy from other males. Then that man becomes a commodity.

Ruth

Men generally are given the freedom to rape the world. They habitually use a strategy of control to fill their desires. Men rarely attempt submission as a way of also filling desires. They rarely think, if I were to contribute and take part then I might fill the minimal desires I need.

Bezelbub

Who do you think the men were pillaging the world for? Carnal pleasure. If they could of had it at home they wouldn't of left their house. The eighteenth century wasn't a utopia for men.

Ruth

The men back then had it better then the women.

Bezelbub

You're deluded. maybe the sexism was installed into the workforce by men was created as a defense for a civilization struggling to escape from the brunt of responsibility forced on men by women.

Ruth

Some how I doubt that.

Bezelbub

Your welcome to doubt, but think about this. Boys are generally competitive, individualistic and yet highly efficient and will embark well into any interaction with the goal of personal benefit. If you allow personal benefit then the boys will be tolerable.

Ruth

Why should we fashion the world for a mutant male sex? Just because you guys can't get along doesn't mean the rest of us can't. I say ignore the little boys and their little squabbles. The rest of us can get a long fine without you.

Bezelbub

You might just get what you are asking for. Modern birthing techniques allow women to have children without fertilization, therefor no men involved... meanwhile men can't have children without the women's ovary.

Ruth

That's good to know!

Bezelbub

The sheep that they cloned genetically?... that was done with a blank ovary without male fertilization and a womb was still needed. The male sex is now completely obsolete!

Ruth

Well, you guys did it to yourself. Halaluya

Bezelbub

On the biological level men have always been at a position of vulnerability even with their general superior physical ability.

Ruth

oh I see, is that how western man raped billions of aborigine peoples.

Bezelbub

It always took only one man to fertilize millions of women. Today, one could create a society of almost all women, who would also be the workers. The male would be used only for fertilization and you would need only one male to do this. You could slaughter all the excess men.

Ruth

There is an idea.

Bezelbub

The amount of production a man could do in the majority of industries could easily be substituted with a women. Beyond the biological reproductive factor, no good comes from an aggressive gender in the mechanistic workings of a healthy society. If women had truly wanted to improve the efficiency, it would be the end of man. It is no wonder that man has instituted sexism into society. Sexism is man's only defense against anialization.

Ruth

That was a twist that I wasn't expecting. Men oppress because they have to?

Bezelbub

If you look historically at men who instituted genetic cleansing, you will find they all treated the women around them well. Hitler was great to all the women who were around him.

Ruth

What about all the non-Aryan women Hitler killed?

Bezelbub

In Hitler's logic it is necessary to purify race. If you take Hitler's philosophy a step further then you get a very militant feminist doctrine. The final purification based on scientific reduction is the death of the mutant and randomizing genes that comes from both Aryan and non-Aryan men.

Ruth

So Hitler would kill himself. Hurrah!

Bezelbub

Or he would attempt to get a sex change.

Maybe that is why we can't find him today!

Ruth

Hitler as a woman. I think I'm going to barf.

Bezelbub

It's possible.

Ruth

The mustache would have to go.

Bezelbub

There is nothing more dangerous to men then a man that listens to women. The pussy-whipped man is a man who installs fear into the mutants. The emancipation of womankind is freedom and that freedom from male oppression can only happen with the death of the mutant sex.. Women simply don't need men...

Ruth

How true.

Bezelbub

The supposed emotional and spiritual companionship that men could offer women can be substituted with another woman.

Ruth

You think you are righteous in your contrary to the mainstream divergence, but yet you are consistent in doctrine with Judeo-Christianity in that you see salvation through men.

Bezelbub

I don't appreciate the comparison. What is salvation when you have eternity? I do not see salvation through men. I see a continuance of the status quo in men.

Ruth

An unconventional neo-conservative.

Bezelbub

A label I can live with. The destruction of this planet and its natural system would be a paradox certainly in the concept of messianic deliverance, as would the extinction of the male sex. The death of mankind would destroy the Judaic concept of g-d and the devil.

Ruth

The bible describes true evil as always male like the force of good itself. The polarities of forces are always male. This is a mistake, but so is what you are saying. Instead of coming to the conclusion that gender identification is a complete sham, you have substituted women for the devil and left the benevolent father figure consistent with monotheism.

Bezelbub

Ha!, no woman has the balls to be the devil. This is no longer about what is righteous. This is about survival. If you see that as righteousness then that is your viewpoint. I see little benevolent in man... I'm man's biggest supporter! I prefer the so-called chosen evil of men to the ways of irresolute women like you.

Ruth

If there was a devil do you think g-d would send him a card during the holiday?

Bezelbub

No.

Ruth

Do you think g-d says, "Hey, Lucifer how are things?" and Lucifer might say, "Not bad. A little hot down here in hell, but that's the breaks of being damned. How are things in heaven?"

Bezelbub

That jerk!

Ruth

g-d is always a haughty guy who wouldn't give Lucifer the time of day. Talk about an unforgiving father figure.

Bezelbub

Amen!

Ruth

Monotheism misleads us into a corner. To hell with the conviction that the realm of g-d is infinitely large by disregarding the diminutive truths.

Bezelbub

There is no one truth.

Ruth

I have my truth. The eternal trick of Western thought is that the knowledge has been coded with masculinity permanently for all eternity.

Bezelbub

Testify.

Ruth

The ultimate trick that Nietsche would understand, as the catch-22 of organized religion.

Bezelbub

Amen.

Ruth

Judaism began the misdeed by manifesting a fixed book. The Jewish commentary was continually building and changing, but the root core of the system was static.

Bezelbub

Amen.

Ruth

Christianity zealously followed this archetype, but it was Judaism that laid the fixed masculine groundwork for Civilization and it's Discontents.

Bezelbub

Then we partially agree.

Ruth

Do we really? You fear that if mankind is destroyed, and woman triumphs, that evil will go out of business?

Bezelbub

Let's hope not.

Ruth

You have nothing to fear. Even after the "Y" chromosome is erased from the flesh of the universe, the code can be salvaged. The data for the male sex exists in all humans. A male can be made from a female.

Bezelbub

Phenomenal. Adam created from Eve's rib.

Ruth

The mutant sex lurks in all of us!

Bezelbub

What about nesting?

Ruth

Nesting?

Bezelbub

The female conspiracy.

Ruth

Freaky cracker!

Bezelbub

In most species the female does most of the child rearing. Therefor the female code or DNA is more vulnerable. For this reason the female designs a series of obstacles for the men to perform so that the male will not betray the female and perform copulation with another female.

Ruth

That makes sense.

Bezelbub

If the male betrays the female then his odds improve in the spread of his genetic code, likewise the female's code has a lesser chance of survival. This is why sexual responsibility is so serious and why some female birds have men build nests.

Ruth

Nesting!

Bezelbub

Exactly! If the male is occupied with nest building then he is less likely to cheat on the female. The male will be forced to build a nest for each female. This is why in our society it is customary for the male to work and provide... the human equivalent of nest building.

Ruth

I don't want your nest.

Bezelbub

But, you want somebody else's.

Ruth

I will build my own nest.

Bezelbub

I'm going to make sure you can't. That's the killer for men. If women can provide the nest then men are useless.... Therefor obsolete! If men are obsolete... they will soon go extinct. I am going to insure that women do not enter the workforce and are incapable of building a nest on their own.

Ruth

So then it's war! Us against you.

Bezelbub

I wouldn't have it any other way.

Ruth

When will it end? You can't win!

Bezelbub

I'm doing my best to not win or lose. Henry Kissinger said that no one will win the war of the sexes because there simply is too much fraternizing with the enemy. The struggle must continue. Let's suppose you were pregnant.

Ruth

With who's baby? Not a chance if you think it would be yours.

Bezelbub

Let's suppose you were pregnant with a child.

Ruth

The hell you say.

Bezelbub

Exactly. Let us suppose you had knowledge that your child would be like an Antichrist.

Ruth

The Antichrist?

Bezelbub

heh heh... whatever you wanna call it.
The one who will bring on the final battle.

Ruth

I would have an abortion

Bezelbub

I should have guessed. You wouldn't have any reservations?

Ruth

None whatsoever. Why are you inquiring?

Bezelbub

Just wondering.



(script continues with realization that Ruth and Bezelbub are the same person. A schizophrenic.)

please report this harrassing FAKE account:

Labels: » » » » » » »


based on the context of these tweets months ago. why didn’t she go to the authorities then? Maybe because @AmandaChapel would have to use her real identity. Shows where her priorities are… why would @purplecar be giving me twirl advice if she believed I was really stalking? that would make her an accessory
noahdavidsimon: @PurpleCar I’m now following you three times. still deciding on my girls name. I need something to stalk with
2 months ago · Reply · View Tweet · Hide Conversation
PurpleCar: @noahdavidsimon Having an @MailOurMilitary pal CAN be hard. It’s WAR. I may offer some thoughts to the ‘orientation’ eMOM pages, maybe blog
2 months ago · Reply · View Tweet
PurpleCar: @noahdavidsimon click on the twhirl logo/word at the top left corner of the twirl window. The instructions will come up in a little window.
about 2 hours later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @PurpleCar I’m now following you three times. still deciding on my girls name. I need something to stalk with
about 1 hour later · Reply · View Tweet
PurpleCar: @noahdavidsimon *sigh* /me shakes head.
1 minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @PurpleCar go to bed then! the fun will continue!
29 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @PurpleCar problem with this s that my updates r going 2b funny n facebook. do U think f I use twittervision on dif account it’ll work?
1 minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @PurpleCar the people of eMOM do not have the maturity or behavior 2 run n operation like that. I will not endorce it n neether should you.
about 14 hours later · Reply · View Tweet
and here is @AmandaChapel trying to defame me:
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon None of the women you stalk here find is funny, artistic or free speech. You’re just scary. You’re forced misogyny.
27 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet · Hide Conversation
noahdavidsimon: @AmandaChapel put ur guard down. I’m not a bad guy. Don’t libel me n call me names (online assassination and u know it)
about 20 hours ago · Reply · View Tweet
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon “my other avatars are to stalk people” | 18 U.S.C. 875 (c) up to 5 yrs in prison; 47 U.S.C. 223 punishable 2 yrs in prison.
about 4 hours later · Reply · View Tweet
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon http://tinyurl.com/68z8se (expand) “my other avatars are to stalk people” | 18 U.S.C. 875(c) + 47 U.S.C. 223 – up to 5 yrs in prison.
16 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel come and join the fun here at @NoahDavidSimon! but I would prefer to see you on Seesmic ;-p
about 15 hours later · Reply · View Tweet
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon | Noah, SEE THIS 18 U.S.C. 875(c) + 47 U.S.C. 223 !!!! http://tinyurl.com/5a22uy (expand)
11 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel and if I announce it publicly… it isn’t a stalk dumb ass! your worse then @Scobleizer when you don’t get a joke.
4 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel twitter is public by nature…admiting a stalk here is within the context of the architecture that is also public.
less than a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel tell me what is the jail term for wrongful prosecution and libel? you don’t want to be in public? Go 2 facebook
less than a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel oh yes facebook… where they kicked you off for lying and saying you were a person that didn’t exist.
half a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel how can I stalk you if you don’t exist? I dare @AmandaChapel to call the police as @AmandaChapel.
less than a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel see if the police like your little frat joke
half a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon None of the women you stalk here find is funny, artistic or free speech. You’re just scary. You’re forced misogyny.
3 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel nonsense. I have a right to speak out and make art. stop it with the lies. go harass geniuses like Robert Crumb or something
4 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel perhaps my art partner Gregory Hergert is also a misogynist? http://tinyurl.com/5rqbuf (expand)
3 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @AmandaChapel this is beyond belief that you would grasp at such a desperate measure. try it again and I will organize a censorship boycott
2 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
amandachapel: @noahdavidsimon AGAIN see http://tinyurl.com/5a22uy (expand) . You are an admitted stalker! http://tinyurl.com/68z8se (expand) IT’S A FEDERAL CRIME!!
2 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @AmandaChapel thinks keeping as many blue state brown shirt Juden Rotts around justifies her persuasion of endorsing Jew Killers.
less than a minute later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @AmandaChapel thinks keeping as many blue state brown shirt Juden Rotts around justifies her persuasion of endorsing Jew Killers.
less than 5 seconds later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel want to try to summize other comments out of context. your worse then @Scobleizer
4 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet
noahdavidsimon: @amandachapel take it to court. I relish counter suing you
5 minutes later · Reply · View Tweet

Playboy: conservative women hate f*(% top 10

Labels: » » »





updated from last week. the original post was 6/2/09

I find it amusing that they didn't just go with it. it would of been interesting to establish the libidinal nature of all of this. when it got outside of the frame of slander they just censored. there is such a thing as hate sex... in language. but the reality is that people who sleep with those they disagree with... are usually not disagreeing privately. they might turn it into play, but the media and the left had a preoccupation for decades with Clintons campaign advisor James Carville (married to Republican political pundit Mary Matalin). the reality is that the polarity of politics is rarely reflected in the bed room. it is just a matter of time before all of us are arguing as "liberals" against American Sharia Conservative law. those that are really against us are not sexy.

MotrinMoms

Labels: » » » »






MonaaaPig & LOLcat

Labels: » » »
MonaaaPig & LOLcat

Stalked Women

Labels: » »
some hot blonde NYC photographer friended me n I can't understand why she'd bother. I thought it was a gay friend's husband's joke at first. I think people are arbitrarily friending on facebook now. b4 people would humiliate me. now all the Heather are out n about. the funny thing is the elitists started getting elite on twitter and panopticons kind of busted they're bubble. now it's friendfeed. in the end... ur country club isn't elite. u made me well known by kicking me out




statistics are dangerous and misrepresent, but a terrorist attack has greater ills then the loss of human life. It is a symbolic act that can create chaos and destroy strong bonds. you fail to understand the power of terrorism if you think of terrorism as simply the loss of human life. Example Hezballah and Lebanon lost more life against Israel, but that was not the determining factor of righteousness. Israel was defending itself. Germany lost millions during WWII, unfortunately life is not always the determining factor of who is right and who is wrong. by breaking the rules we become terrorists. Rule breaking isn't necessarily morally wrong. Panopticons broke understood precedent on twitter (but not twitter terms). No one died. I consider it a guerrilla act against the twitter A List establishment. It was a success in creating a sense of distrust in the twitter community. No one died. Am I wrong?

MOMMY!

Labels: » »
I just joined a group for the 8 month pregnant marine who was killed in Iraq... and I realized for once I had some kind of strange liquid in my eye when I read about a pregnant soldier who was murdered. I left a post... that asked for some details and realized that I was leaving behind an image of myself popping out of toilet. This idea that we universalize our image to where we leave a post is a bad thing. People might think I was insincere for the picture.



MAKE ME A BABY LADY

Labels:







Translate