The benefits of Internet porn

This link between an increase in web porn and a decrease in rape was first noted in 2006 by Clemson economist Todd Kendall. Kendall’s study, which was supported by the National Bureau of Economic Research, concluded that “Internet access appears to be a substitute for rape; in particular, the results suggest that a 10 percentage point increase in Internet access is associated with a decline in reported rape victimization of around 7.3 percent.”
Recent statistics indicate that Kendall’s research was no fluke. In fact, as Internet access — as well as the amount of cheap or free online porn — has further increased, incidences of rape and sexual assault have continued to plummet.
According to the National Crime Victimization survey, an annual report published by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, the rape/sexual assault rate fell from 5 per 1,000 American women over age 12 in 1995 to 1.8 per 1,000 in 2011.
“Over the past two decades, as pornography has become much more easily accessible over the Internet, the rate of rape and sexual assault has declined by about 60 percent,” according to Ronald Bailey, a science correspondent at Reason magazine.
Even one 2009 Texas A&M study that began with an assumption that easy access to porn led to more rapes found that the opposite was true. The study’s authors admitted that “the increasing availability of pornography appears to be associated with a decline in rape.”
While crime rates are on the decline for all types of offenses, “it’s only rape (and sexual assault) that appears to be pegged to online connectivity,” Bailey reports.
Besides reducing the horrendous crimes of rape and sexual assault, online porn also appears to reduce several societal ills, as well. Over the last dozen years, since Internet pornography use first became widespread in the U.S., rates of divorce and teen pregnancy have also fallen.
Read more:

So I guess that book they pushed at Carnegie Mellon University by Susan Wendell was bullshit. It is a shame the school treated men so poorly based on the fraudulent data of a feminist

So much for #feminist porn studies of Susan Wendell

Porn is exciting to females (unless it feels like the females are being the object of humiliation)

(The chimpanzee who's addicted to porn: Spanish scientist's astonishment at female ape who won't stop watching adult TV) A Spanish scientist says he has discovered a female chimpanzee who is addicted to watching porn.Gina, a resident of Seville Zoo, chose to solely watch adult entertainment channels when a Freeview television and remote control was placed in her enclosure.Primatologist Pablo Herreros, writing in Spanish newspaper El Mundo at the weekend, told how he made the discovery some years ago on a tour of the nation's chimpanzee enclosures.

“Current Laws on All Forms of Pornography and Obscenity Need to Be Vigorously Enforced”

(Eugene)So says the Republican Party Platform, and this leads me to questions I asked in 2004, when the Bush Administration called for a pornography crackdown.
As we know, there’s lots of porn of all varieties out there on the Internet, including porn that might well be seen as offensive to “community standards” in at least one American state (the standard that would be applicable under the plurality view in Ashcroft v. ACLU (I) (2002), if prosecutors choose to bring a case in that state), or perhaps even under some “national community standard” (the alternative standard urged to varying extents by the other opinions in that case). In principle, the government might well be able to prosecute many American pornography producers and distributors under current obscenity laws.
But even if every single U.S. producer is shut down, wouldn’t foreign sites happily take up the slack? It’s not like Americans have some great irreproducible national skills in smut-making, or like it takes a $100 million Hollywood budget to make a porn movie. Foreign porn will doubtless be quite an adequate substitute for the U.S. market. Plus the foreign distributors might even be able to make and distribute copies of the existing U.S.-produced stock — I doubt that the imprisoned American copyright owners will be suing them for infringement (unless the U.S. government seizes the copyrights, becomes the world’s #1 pornography owner, starts trying to enforce the copyrights against overseas distributors, and gets foreign courts to honor those copyrights, which is far from certain and likely far from cheap).
And even if overall world production of porn somehow improbably falls by some substantial amount, will that seriously affect the typical porn consumer’s diet? Does it matter whether you have, say, 100,000 porn titles (and live feeds) to choose from, or just 25,000?
So we have three possible outcomes:
(1) The U.S. spends who knows how many prosecutorial and technical resources going after U.S. pornographers. A bunch of them get imprisoned. U.S. consumers keep using the same amount of porn as before. Maybe they can’t get porn on cable channels or in hotel rooms any more, but that’s so twentieth century; instead, consumers will continue to be able to get more than they ever wanted on the Internet. Nor do I think that the crackdown will somehow subtly affect consumers’ attitudes about the morality of porn — it seems highly unlikely that potential porn consumers will decide to stop getting it because they hear that some porn producers are being prosecuted.
The only potential benefit: If you think the porn industry is very bad for porn actors, you’re at least sparing Americans actors that harm, and shifting it off-shore instead. But that has little to do with “Making the Internet Family-Friendly,” which is what the platform bills the “vigorous[] enforce[ment]” policy as relating to. And as to changing what’s available on the Internet, the investment of major prosecutorial resources yields a net practical benefit of roughly zero.
(2) The government gets understandably outraged by the “foreign smut loophole.” “Given all the millions that we’ve invested in going after the domestic porn industry, how can we tolerate all our work being undone by foreign filth-peddlers?,” pornography prosecutors and their political allies would ask. So they unveil the solution, in fact pretty much the only solution that will work: Nationwide filtering.
It’s true: Going after cyberporn isn’t really that tough — if you require every service provider in the nation to block access to all sites that are on a constantly updated government-run “Forbidden Off-Shore Site” list. Of course, there couldn’t be any trials applying community standards and the like before a site is added to the list; that would take far too long. The government would have to be able to just order a site instantly blocked, without any hearing with an opportunity for the other side to respond, since even a quick response would take up too much time, and would let the porn sites just move from location to location every several weeks.
Sure, that sounds like a violation of First Amendment procedural rules, even when the government is going after substantively unprotected obscenity. Sure, that would make it easier for the government to put all sorts of other sites on the list. Sure, it’s a substantially more intrusive step than any of the American Internet regulations we’ve seen so far, and is substantially more intrusive in some ways than nearly all speech restrictions in American history. (I say in some ways, not in all ways, since it would have a limited substantive focus — but the procedure would be highly restrictive, and First Amendment law has always recognized the practical importance of procedure.) But it’s the only approach that has any hope of really reducing the accessibility of porn to American consumers.
(3) Finally, the government can go after the users: Set up “honeypot” sites (seriously, that would be the technically correct name for them) that would look like normal offshore pornography sites. Draw people in to buy the stuff. Figure out who the buyers are. To do that, you’d also have to ban any anonymizer Web sites that might be used to hide such transactions, by setting up some sort of mandatory filtering such as what I described in option (2).
Then arrest the pornography downloaders and prosecute them for receiving obscene material over the Internet, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462; see, e.g., United States v. Whorley (4th Cir. 2008) (holding that such enforcement is constitutional, and quite plausibly so holding, given the United States v. Orito Supreme Court case). As best I can tell, this statute has recently been used only as an adjunct in child pornography prosecutions, where the prosecutors think the person is trying to get child pornography but add a receipt of obscenity charge just in case they can’t prove the child pornography charge. But it is a “current law[] on ... obscenity,” out there to be used.
Heck, lock each pornography viewer up for several years like you would a child porn buyer. Make him register as a sex offender. Seize his house on the theory that it’s a forfeitable asset, since it was used to facilitate an illegal transaction. All because he, or he and his wife, like to get turned on by watching pictures of people having sex (or perhaps just pictures of people having sufficiently kinky sex, or pretending to have sufficiently kinky sex). Then repeat for however many people it takes to get everyone scared of the Smut Police.
So we really have three possible outcomes:

1. The crackdown on porn is doomed to be utterly ineffective at preventing the supposedly harmful effects of porn on its viewers, and on the viewers’ neighbors.
2. The crackdown on porn will be made effective — by implementing a comprehensive government-mandated filtering system run by some administrative agency that constantly monitors the Net and requires private service providers to block any sites that the agency says are obscene.
3. The crackdown on porn will turn into a full-fledged War on Smut that will be made effective by prosecuting, imprisoning, and seizing the assets of porn buyers.

Seriously, I don’t see many other alternatives. The government could try to put pressure on financial intermediaries, for instance requiring Visa and MasterCard to refuse transactions with certain locations; but unless that’s made just as intrusive as option #2 above, it will be hopelessly ineffective, since sites can easily just periodically change their payee names, or use various offshore intermediaries.
The government might also try to persuade foreign countries to join its campaign, but I’m pretty sure that won’t work, either. First, the Europeans are apparently fairly tolerant of much porn. Second, I highly doubt that we can persuade every poor third-world country, some of which have thriving trades in real flesh, to spend its resources creating and actually enforcing anti-porn laws, in the face of whatever payoffs the porn industry is willing to provide.
So, supporters of that plank of the platform, which do you prefer — #1, #2, or #3? Note that I’m not asking whether porn is bad, or whether porn should be constitutionally protected. I’m certainly not asking whether we’d be better off in some hypothetical porn-free world (just like no sensible debate about alcohol, drug, or gun policy should ask whether we’d be better off in some hypothetical alcohol-, drug-, or gun-free world).
I’m asking: How can the government’s policy possibly achieve its stated goals, without creating an unprecedentedly intrusive censorship machinery, one that’s far, far beyond what any mainstream political figures are talking about right now?

my primary concern is protecting the young from compromising their dignity. It might be worth passing a law if we were to go after porn producers to demand that people who would leave the country to perform pornographic acts for pay would not be invited back in the country. Obviously self benefit is being plaid here and maybe we should take the incentives of foreign porn out. It'd be nice to know that less sluts were living in my neighborhood. I'm sure the sluts will get along swimmingly in countries that don't share our moral sense aka the boundary between us an the apes. Maybe the moral-less would like to live with the apes. you can't kill the demand for sex, but you can kill the incentive to meet the demand. non paid sex I have no problem with. This is all moot if we don't prosecute present porn laws.

Let's just say there is enough reasons to get Obama out and ignore something stupid the GOP is saying. But the holes in the problem are now documented. Obviously going after the supply is hard if people can always come back into the country.

Will Porn Be Banned in Egypt? That Arab Spring is LIMP!

(Challah) @ Bikya Masr

Egypt’s ultra-conservative al-Nour religious party said on its Facebook page on Monday that the party’s MP Younis Makhioun has put forward a request for an “urgent briefing” to ban pornography websites from the Internet in Egypt.
The request is expected to be discussed shortly in Egypt’s lower house.
The news saw praise and condemnation alike from Egyptians as many commentators showed support and urged for the ban to be passed, while others objected on the loss of personal freedoms.
Others feared that it would not stop at pornography sites, but would go on to crackdown on other websites conservatives believe go against their creed.
In 2011, Egypt landed in the number five spot globally in searching for “sex” online, joined by Algeria and Morocco also in the top 10, according to Google trends. Arabic language is used second only to English as the language of search choice for adult content online.

Some of those feminist leftists are going to be happy about this... they were the ones that pushed this Arab Spring. When the men start getting repressed and break into rape marathons... I doubt anyone will feel enlightened. Send in the pretty Western journalists to get groped in Tahrir Square again.

Firefighter Porn: LAFD Employees Being Investigated For Adult Videos That Used Fire Trucks as Props

(Digital Spy)(LAWeekly) Los Angeles firefighters have come under attack for allegedly filming pornographic movies while on duty. Emergency workers in Venice Beach are due to be investigated for allowing their vehicles to be used in adult pictures, NBC reports. If the allegations are proven to be true, the guilty firefighters will have violated LAFD policy by failing to "operate apparatus in a way that does not compromise the reputation of the department". "The fire chief is adamant about addressing the issue, finding out what took place," LAFD spokesperson Captain Tina Haro said. "The professional standards division is following all leads, all reasonable leads, leaving no stone unturned. "The fire chief absolutely will not tolerate the type of thing that might have happened in that videotape." However, a department insider claimed that the entire station was aware of the firefighters' actions and considered them to be "good, clean fun".The LAFD are also investigating firefighters from another station in Hollywood over similar allegations. ​One fire official tells the station there is "zero tolerance" for the use of official LAFD apparatuses that way. "Look at this fire truck," actress Charley Chase is quoted as saying: "Isn't that nice."

Legal Experts: Casey Anthony Will Be Released From Jail

kids are not talking about Lady Arberlin.

...I got scared when I called my seven year old son on the phone at his Grandparents house and the first thing out of his mouth was Casey Anthony. I don't know much about it... but I guess I'm going to learn. Casey's looking at four misdemeanors, which she could stack or run concurrent, but she's already served most of the time, An adult entertainment company offered Anthony a deal to star in porn movies. Later, Steve Hirsch, the chief of Vivid Entertainment, withdrew the offer. TMZ h/t USAToday

Gloria Steinem's Anti-Christ!

He has one of the largest collections of pornography and erotica in the world, but don't call Clifford Scheiner a dirty old man.
The former Brooklyn emergency room doctor with a Ph.D. in sexuality has amassed an enormous hoard of 350,000 books, films and photos - from 13th century manuscripts to every issue of Playboy and Screw magazine ever printed.
"It is certainly one of the largest collections of erotology and sexology in the world," he says.
Scheiner, 61, of Flatbush, has been collecting since the late 1960s, but he insists his fascination is purely academic.
"I became interested because of the mystery involved," he said. "To hear people talk about it - nobody bought it, nobody sold it, nobody owned it, nobody printed it, nobody illustrated it and nobody bound it, but the books were there and that intrigued me."
He dove headfirst into books that took great effort to decipher.
"I taught myself to recognize most of the dirty words in most of the languages that use the Roman alphabet," he said. "I don't have huge language skills, but I get a pretty good idea of what is going on."
Ultimately, he went into the book business, starting a mail-order company, C.J. Scheiner Books. "I never paid retail for anything," he said.
Scheiner, born in Clifton, N.J., studied molecular biophysics and biochemistry at Yale, got a medical degree from SUNY Downstate and later earned a Ph.D. from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco.
By the 1980s, the collection swelled, with people selling him rare texts, stacks of magazines, photographs, prints and film reels. All the while, he worked as an emergency room doctor at Kings County Hospital - a job he kept until 2003.
"I supported myself entirely from the book business. I wasn't spending any of my salary from being a doctor on the cost of daily living," he said. "I was dealing in things ranging from $5 to $85,000.
"Of course, I took a lot of money I made selling books and used it to buy more books," he added. "That's why I now have more than 350,000 items."

more via yourjewishnews.com

Flatbush Jewish doctor has the largest porn collection? I love this guy!

Nazi Porn

French politician friends on Facebook of antisemitic pornographer Dietlieb Felderer. A reader wrote to draw our attention to the Facebook page of Austrian anti-Semitic, pornographer and Holocaust-denier (a bit difficult to write and to understand) Dietlieb Felderer.  He has around 70 amis, and one of them is French member of the European Parliament Bruno Gollnisch (Front National).  He used to be very close to the party's ex chairman Jean-Marie Le Pen and number two of the party.   Gollnisch is a professor at the University of Lyon III . Interesting to see that these far right folks have some strange friends.

Photos from  Felderer's Facebook.  There are more than a 100 like these :

I'm going to warn you of some NAZI porn here... so scroll down if you want to see this... (well of course you will)

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

keep going

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

ignore these Weiners

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

uh oh

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

it also might be a good idea to not scroll down further

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

no seriously... I'm about to show another Weiner pic

I'm not kidding... get the kids out of the room

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

ok here goes

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The word Holocaust is not English, not French, not German, not Hebrew. The word Holocaust is Greek and refers to the Phallic Fertility Cult of the Greeks in which the penis MOVED UP (Holocausted) into an erection to make Fertility possible.

if you want to see more... click for more via philosemitism.blogspot.com

I'm not going to comment

perhaps you feel more comfortable with something Heterosexual mein freund?

http://xrl.us/NaziPorn image via spacereptilesareyourfriend.com

Osama Bin Wankin'

If 50 percent of men have two wives each, then the other 50 percent don't get any wives at all.

...give in to the urge...

...Why_is_Islam_the_only_religion that motivates its followers to commit suicide missions? The surprising answer from the evolutionary psychological perspective is that Muslim suicide bombing may have nothing to do with Islam or the Koran (except for two lines in it).

...I don't recollect Mormons in Utah ever having this problem.

It may have nothing to do with the religion, politics, the culture, the race, the ethnicity, the language, or the region. As with everything else from this perspective, it may have a lot to do with sex, or, in this case, the absence of sex.What distinguishes Islam from other major religions is that it tolerates polygyny. By allowing some men to monopolize all women and altogether excluding many men from reproductive opportunities, polygyny creates shortages of available women. If 50 percent of men have two wives each, then the other 50 percent don't get any wives at all.
So polygyny increases competitive pressure on men, especially young men of low status. It therefore increases the likelihood that young men resort to violent means to gain access to mates. By doing so, they have little to lose and much to gain compared with men who already have wives. Across all societies, polygyny makes men violent, increasing crimes such as murder and rape, even after controlling for such obvious factors as economic development, economic inequality, population density, the level of democracy, and political factors in the region. - Psychology Today By Alan S. Miller, Ph.D
I don't buy the theory that sex is the isolated factor here.

if only they were Zionists...
then they could try our secret SEX CANDY!
Hamas suspects that Israeli intelligence services
are supplying its Gaza Strip stronghold
with chewing gum that boosts the sex drive...

...Many Liberals ponder why the principles of Abraham Lincoln's abolitionist Republican party stood for two pillars. One was the end of slavery for all men.  The other pillar was one man and one woman in marriage. They actually had a real issue  as many Christians were quoting the bible and the patriarchs certainly lived this way. But the Torah was written within the context of a Supernatural force.  This Supernatural force was communicating to the people and even changed it's mind to Noah once. Once the laws became impossible because of the loss of the Holy of Holies and the Ark after the destruction of the first temple it became impossible to forfill G-d's written requests.  Certainly a supernatural force could control nature, but what happens when it is gone?

Let's see what the old coot was into. Simon's right; it would probably be of considerable psychological interest. As Simon notes, by the way: "According to one report: 'The discovery of pornography taken during raids on Islamic militants is not uncommon, officials told Reuters.'”

Repressed hypocritical psychopaths.

Women REALLY DO SUCK:
'Bin Laden Called in His Location to the CIA Because He Was Being Driven Mad Cooped Up for Five Years With So Many Wives and Children'

Sex is a factor... no doubt, much like the analysis of poverty before (which turned out to be not true in that most active jihadists are UPPER MIDDLE CLASS)
U.S. envoy to the United Nations told the Security Council on Thursday that troops loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi were increasingly engaging in sexual violence and some had been issued the impotency drug Viagra, diplomats said.
P David Hornik, Eye-on-the-world and image via SodaHead

Late Night Entertainment

Samantha Ardente: High School secretary suspended for being porn star

Samantha Ardente
(Credit: Pegas Productions)

....don't bother me...
I'm just doing it for the Google Juice...

Samantha_Ardente,a_Canadian_high_school_secretary, is waiting to see if she gets to keep her day job after officials discovered that she moonlighted as a XXX porn star.The Quebec City-area school board is now considering whether she deserves more than a suspension for cavorting in the movie "Serial Abusers 2" and other films.  The woman known as Ardente on screen was undone after a high school student spotted her in the porn video. The student tried to get her autograph - and she tried to get him to keep her secret. But, not surprisingly, her plea was rejected and the video spread like wildfire.
via cbsnews.com /AP

via dailymail.co.uk

ICANN has .xxx domain names? Yes!

The controversial step to approve .xxx domain names has today been taken by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, paving the way for a whole slew of new addresses suffixed by the famous triplicate x. Funnily enough, before the decision was made today, opposition to it was proffered by both conservative groups opposed to pornography and adult entertainment companies fearing they'd be more easily compartmentalized and potentially blocked by overzealous governments. Moreover, every popular adult website at present will pretty much be forced to buy its .xxx version, which, for an industry famous for its frugality, will be an understandably tough pill to swallow. We are surprised not to see the people of Amsterdam consulted, however -- their city's emblem features three Xs too, shouldn't they have a say in this?
A further meeting is scheduled by ICANN for June 20th to discuss opening up all possible domain name suffixes to registration, pending the validation of a set of guidelines for approval. That's looking quite likely to be passed too, as the AFP sagely notes that there's a celebratory party scheduled for two days after the event. URLs are about to get a lot more varied, it seems; they're certainly going to feature a lot more of the (English) alphabet's 24th letter, whatever the case.

via engadget.com

whoooooooopie?

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Staring at BOOBIES increases Heart Health:

So what will the feminists say about PORN NOW? Anything that is good is oppressive to women is my guess. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for any sensible response.

There are Rumors circulating...
that this story is fake.
I have not seen any proof of that claim...

I also am fairly certain that
the girl on the left
is showing Natural Boobs,
but the woman in the video clip
might very well have fake ones...

Common sense will always defy those that reject difference or those who think they can stop difference through technology ....Gloria Steinem just did not get it. I understand she had her feelings hurt... and certainly we should not hurt women's feelings and even lie to them if they can't take the truth, but we can not let these non human ideas rule us. We aren't cyborgs! I would be willing to bet that breast visuals help. no public relations from Gloria Steinem and friends can convince me otherwise. it might be interesting to see if boobies can help women too. Though I would be willing to bet that in certain conditions that boobies can raise your blood pressure.

Porn Hating Feminists and their Bully Alpha Males Wrong AGAIN?: Five-hundred men participated in the German study. Half were told to refrain from looking at breasts for five years, the other half were told to ogle them daily.

The study found the men who stared at breasts more often showed lower rates of heart problems, a lower resting heart rate and lower blood pressure.
The authors of the study recommend that men stare at breasts for 10 minutes a day.

Response from WOMEN to the FACT that looking at BOOBS is good for your health

So the "Women's voices" at Cosmo are now saying that SHOPPING is healthy. Though the timing is suspect... they are probably right.

In a primate
where there is no monogamy
the burden of raising children
is on the women. 
What does that tell you
about single mothers?

see also USA Cheerleaders Wear Pants for Sharia

Study: Staring at breasts increases heart health: MyFoxBOSTON.com

I guess the leftists that run  snopes.com
got it wrong again.   And I'm willing to bet that this is how the study was attempted.  The irony is the feminists won the last presidential election because of SNOPES... and now we see how influential the site is on public opinion. SNOPES apparently had public opinion contained against common sense.  Of course women's boobs are good for men.h/t allamericanblogger.com

Can Porn save the Environment?

I was doing a lot of thinking about the first amendment this month,,,,
I noticed that several social networks have opened for porn...

and they are encouraging people to share pornography....
If people are sharing porn online... why would they put their credit cards out?

(imagine Jenna Jameson talking it is the ass, but first it's Miller Time
because Porn Commercial endorsements are the future)

This might bring a chuckle at first... but there is no financially stable working porn model... Hi-def maybe? but frankly I don't mind cheap internet snips... and most other people like to watch the 60 second teasers as much as I do... we simply get tired of the scene after that long.

Some thing else dawned on me. The main financial support for 1st amendment issues (the porn industry) is about to take a dive. If the porn industry takes a financial dive the way the music industry is now... why would they spend money on the legal fees to protect dip shits (like Larry Flynt who is now endorsing KooKooChiniK for president). What I'm saying is that we could be facing some very rough freedom of expression waters. With communications becoming increasingly international and no longer on U.S. soil... I could see a social network not honoring free speech whatsoever... and that is frankly scary and I don't think there is anybody with deep pockets like Larry Flynt anymore. The Volvo soccer mom's and all that sexual perversion hysteria just might win out the day... because there is more money in "Security" then "Porn".

I have already documented my experience in New York City under Rudy Ghouliani... (keep in mind I'm a white Republican who is writing this). Perhaps this Donna Hanover feminist hysteria is ripe for a national platform.... It seems that both political parties are targeting our "BILL OF RIGHTS"

....and the porn industry is in no financial position to fight this anymore

for the study on strippers and their chemical cycles in relation to tip quantity you will find it in this weeks issue of NYTimes Magazine page 79. (December 9th 2007 - The Year in Ideas)

"Lap Dance Science"

it might not make sense for Hilary to work when she's not ovulating. but then again... "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Right Bill? Worked great when he prosecuted the American worker for sexual harassment while he ordered pizza out with Monica Lewinsky. And the biggest embarrassment in armed force history occurs in Abu Gharaib... but "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"... you might offend Brook Shields.

I would like to see Brook shoot herself in the head like she did in Freeway.


How come Woody Allen and Michael Douglas's marriage is working Anita Hill?

Porn Star Dumps Democrats

It's all about financial frugality or something. As well as an obvious tweak of the RNC.

"While this decision has not been an easy one, recent events regarding Republican National Committee fundraising at Voyeur, an LA based lesbian bondage themed nightclub finally tipped the scales.
"As I have said for well over a year, it is time that our government and our tax policy begin rewarding entrepreneurship and creativity again. It is time again to inspire positive risks and out-of-the-box thinking in the interest of growing a strong economy and a strong America.
"For me, this spirit can be summed up in the RNC's investment of donor funds at Voyeur.
"As someone who has worked extensively in both the club and film side of the Adult Entertainment Industry, I know from experience that a mere $1900 outlay at a club with the reputation of Voyeur is a clear indication of a frugal investment with a keen eye toward maximum return.
"And I firmly believe that it is precisely this type of creative and calculated investing that we, as taxpaying Americans, should expect not only from our political parties but from our government. The American taxpayer deserves consistent conservatives who reject wasteful spending and unwarranted government intervention in the private sector.
"As is the case with so many of my fellow Louisianans, I have been a registered Democrat throughout my life. But now I cannot help but recognize that over time my libertarian values regarding both money and sex and the legal use of one for the other is now best espoused by the Republican Party."

via jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com