universal fly

the root of western religion does not set up duality. Duality comes from Zoroaster and Iran. Talmudic thought does not work in binary. Duality is the root of science which comes from Cartesian thought and the idea of separation between mind and body.

Judea-Monotheism does not have an avatar of evil. Satan has some "folk stories", but his appearance in the old testament isn't clarified. the idea in Jewish thought is to get closer to g-d. Proximity is a relative concept. read the Talmud and check.

many argue that Christianity was a bastardization of Zoraoster, Hellenism and Judaism. angel wars and the concept of wars between dark angels and angels of light are ideas that developed out of Persia.

In fact there have been archeological finds of "Holy Scrolls" from the period of Persian influence on Judaic thought and they are full of all kinds of strange "Angel" wars. If you look at Zoroaster art you will see the parallel between their religion and what developed afterwards. The lost scrolls are not cannon today in either Judaism or Christianity, but you can clearly see the philosophical evolution after Zoroaster's influence. I'm not a person who believes in the stiffness in scripture, mostly because I have seen the evolution in thought. for me to see spirituality as binary is as pagan as worshipping something material like an idol. to believe a document is pure is to say it is a g-d itself and to do this is pagan. I am not literal with scripture and no learned Jew would be because to do so would be to glorify something that is material.

also the duality in buddhism is really not a duality at all. I don't claim to be of that philosophy, but that duality is symbiotic and dependent in each other. for me that is a bit systematic. eastern duality is really a more one like metaphor. too complicated for me. I don't apply math on my g-d.

universal fly
Originally uploaded by simonstudionyc

"The reason the FED let Lehman fail was because of the price of the Oil

Labels: »
"The reason the FED let Lehman fail was because of the price of the Oil. Oil was trading at 140 usd a barrel. Today Oil is at 44 usd a barrel." - Igor The Troll”

" Too much Gas in the economy! It was all set up! If you want the car to stall, overflow it with Gas! The Markets were set up to fail buy manipulating the price of OIL from 90 usd to 140 usd. Lehman could not hold the position because it was betting that the OIL price would come down. When the OIL went to 140 usd, Lehman needed to increase collateral, but it did not have enough liquid assets." - Igor The Troll

"Letting OIL fall was politically desired moral hazard. Hence, the FED let Lehman bite the bullet. Collateral Damage to fix US trade imbalance. The OIL going from 90 usd to 140 usd was done intentionally to have the economy FAIL. This was done to make Bush look bad to get Obama elected." - Igor The Troll


"If you want to confirm my hypotheses check George Soros trades. Was he Buying OIL from 90 usd to 140 usd??? OIL went from 90 to 140 from Jan 2008 to July" - Igor The Troll


"This chart will show you the picture. From beginning of 2008 someone bought OIL like crazy. The market started to come down in the middle of 2007 because of the change to accounting rule, make mark to market." - Igor The Troll

"Lehman was selling insurance for OIl, which is logical and good bet when OIL trading at 90. Who was buying insurance, besides the hedge funds who manipulated the price? Airline companies who need to guaranty OIL price at 90 or they lose money flying the planes on set air ticket price. Also OIL exporters want export price guarantied. But there is no reason to have the price of OIL go from 90 to 140 when economy is slowing down. The price of OIL should have declined not went up. By forcing the price of OIL to go up from 90 to 140 in the short period, you make it unprofitable for corporations to make business. So by manipulating OIL up you cause the economy to crash! So being now the government spending trillions of dollars to fix the economy, why they did not lend Lehman 100 billion to stay in business? The crash was set up to get Obama elected! Lehman was the fall guy, a scapegoat! " - Igor The Troll

my understanding was that the price of oil we don't control. do you think Obama used his OPEC connections to screw Bush? pushed the price of oil up? Bush was a fall guy... betrayed by his business partners who wanted to work with a new guy? ....but now wait a second... it was Bush who let Lehman fail. not Obama! - NoahDavidSimon

Bush did not let Lehman fail, he had no power to do anything. Paulson is a democrat plant from Goldman Sachs. The Goldman Sachs boys decided time to work with the new to be administration - Democrats. They are just covering their Asses with the best bet to win! ;-) - Igor The Troll

Obama is OPEC's boy from a long time ago. OPEC did not want McCain to win, because McCain was going to Iran. OPEC chose to support their new Horse Obama. - Igor The Troll


Labels: » » »

Everybody wants to help?

Virtual Sexuality

Labels: » » » » » »

Society simply can not address all the classifications of gender and sexuality. by simply identifying a character as straight or gay it limits the spectrum of psychological profiles. this is why our government should not create social contracts merely on who we like... but our civilization needs to create structures that reflect our architecture.

there is less an issue of gender orientation and more a dynamic of if a person is an objectifier or an objectified. is a person dominant or receiving. does a person get off on being shot at or not? being that this world is virtual... it doesn't even work because it is a waste... it is a sacrifice... a martyrdom of time we all choose. we are all there to be submissive to the machine. in life there is an architecture to female submission in sexuality. babies can be made. If I agree to get shot at on xbox with labor and pain do I get the joy of creating other lives?

this assumes that it is just a game. I think politics, sex and religion have no place in the virtual world exactly because they do. it is an example of how transparency must be limited. we are all there to be submissive to the machine and therefor our hidden agendas might have symbolic implications that destroy the community. We are all in labor with each other for the system which is our child.

There is a sexual dynamic to virtual hunting and this is why it might be threatening to bring in identity into this. certainly the industry opened themselves up to something when they created Tomb Raider and Street Fighter. now the question is what does a gay character do to a game when the very game is a play at submission. I'm certain there are no coded answers to these questions. we invite sexuality into the sphere. the virtual vixens are in fact very "lesbian" esque... and of course they also create a male hetero fetish. They are muscular and they are aggressive... the industry created this out of it's own desire to sell games. but in fact it is popular because it appeals to a desire for men to submit. to role play something that they can't in life.

it is a matter of health to allow a certain level of libidinal desire that might be damaging to oneself. we as human beings might even be more healthy because we experiment with this other side. this duality. I'm not sure this should be coded as homosexual or transgender. if this element is dangerous to the game then it should not be an option.

the entire market for this is because the natural male instinct for hunting and fighting is taken away from society. people are repressed. if they invite the natural fetish into the sphere... then it is their fault. The irony of virtual combat is that it involves submission... and perhaps all combat is submissive to a larger machine. Is it no wonder that sexuality and the military must be so contained. A person who invites the system out of libidinal desire has no place because there is no boundary. Certainly a great fighter might enjoy it, but how dangerous to have such a zealous warrior. These desires need to be contained and yet allowed in it's place.

shape up! you obviously like being a pessimist. you are again fixating on the negative because you have found it to be a way to get interaction. you are doing it right now. I have the tiniest violin in the world playing virtually in your sphincter. go do something nice for your boyfriend and stop being so selfish.

save the starving anarexics in Beverly Hills!

Check out this interesting answer on Yedda

Yedda – People. Sharing. Knowledge.I think I am mentally ill!!

Answered by SimonStudio on March 16, 2009
View the entire discussion on YeddaYedda – People. Sharing. Knowledge.


Google+ Badge

Google+ Followers