Seize Tweet

Labels:

SO HOT

Labels:
http://friendfeed.com/sarabeach/63cb61e8/re-charlie-rose-sarah-palinhttp://seesmic.com/threads/MHBKeyDXG1

Sarah Palin

Labels:

taxes

Labels:
Re: Response: Welfare for Wealthy (Pt2) Tax BILLIONS Diverted to Subsidieshttp://simonstudio.com/ark

Gumba fight

Labels:

Someone Explain Hope To Me

Labels: » »
Democratic Convention is NO HOPEhttp://simonstudio.com/ark

Driving @PurpleCar

Labels: » »






Democrats finally Agree to Offshore Drilling... but with the Castro Bros.

Labels: » »








Panopticons and 2face aMANdaCHAPel http://ping.fm/dKmae

Doh! Mahna Mahna a porn song?

Labels:
Is that guy stalking you on twitter again? It is called following!


http://ping.fm/lDHWd

Mahna Mahna ...Leave twitter? not a chance @aMANdaCHAPel

Labels:










http://new.seesmic.com/threads/xddLErYKQA
http://ping.fm/ojnK6 Leave twitter? not a chance!
Say Goodnight Mr Bear http://ping.fm/FJSX4
http://ping.fm/1WVY0 NAKED ON SEESMIC!

NAKED ON SEESMIC

Labels: »


video=WHdI94N1h



Re: Naked on Seesmic http://ping.fm/nPsL1
Designed Pink Garden's new site ;-p http://xrl.us/onmy8

Pink Garden

Labels:

http://djstrawberryshortcake.blogspot.com
taking a nap
Hamas has a twitter account and twitter thinks I am more dangerous then Hamas? BLUE STATE TYRANNY anyone?
If the women aren't wearing mini skirts, then it isn't Star Trek. I want a future that doesn't feel like the Clinton administration. Give me some of that wild Captain Kirk free love and leave the Gloria Steinem stuff for some tyrannical alien here to be known as from "Planet Blue State"
http://ping.fm/mFTC8 still can't figure out how2 comment on other people's posts on rejaw
still can't figure out how2 comment on other people's posts on rejaw http://ping.fm/fzg5b
unbelievable! dad's$300 compaq computer buy still doesn't work after attempting 2fix it 4a month. Dad never listens and goes 4the deal
Working on that Panopticons Vs. eMOM & Twitter paintings

2face @aMANdaChapel

Labels: »


libel is not free speech. regardless I am not unaware that I can have allies that disagree. the problem here is that @aMANdaChapel has power and she is using it to hurt people. She has twitter's ear. I will not let her go into a free public showcase forum of html and let her accuse me of rape without fighting to get my story out by any means necessary. I will not allow her to say I am a rapist. She has never even met me and she is fabricating stories based on spin.

Accused Rapist at large is brought 2U by Secret. Strong enough for @aMANdaChapel, but made for a woman!

Labels:



Accused Rapist at large is brought 2U by Secret. Strong enough for @aMANdaChapel, but made for a woman!

Accused Rapist at large is brought 2U by Secret. Strong enough for @aMANdaChapel, but made for a woman!

Labels:

aMANdaChapel has accused me of RAPE?

Labels: »











Or is it Brian Connolly? Who is Strumpette?




before you believe anything from @aMANdaChapel has said





http://getsatisfaction.com/twitter/topics/member_abuse_on_twitter




Member Abuse on Twitter - I wish to lodge a member complaint against Twitter member @amandachapel




















same old Brian Connolly! I have been dealing with this same issue and it is why it became necessary to surveillance the activity of her constant libel and accusations. Amanda looks for people to say things in jest and she takes them out of context into a wider forum. We could just as easily take the content of Amanda Chapel's blog and assume she pimps to the PR industry. The question is does she ask directly or does she go to a wider forum and libel people? In the case of her recent accusation (in which she libels and says I raped a girl).... she didn't even take the words out of context. She completely fabricates a different story. The entire reason for @Panopticons to begin with was to surveillance Amanda Chapel and her circle. If you don't do anything about her libel, then people are forced to protect their own reputations. This is a fact and all you need to do is a google search Amanda Chapel and the history of her to see exactly what I am talking about.

old plurk cow has high karma

Labels: »





BatMan Panopticons?

Labels: » » » »











the philosophical and political issues were played well. Dark Knight is most certainly an argument for voting Republican. Surveillance to fight violence? The need to lie to save Democracy and Justice? I don't think Obama would feel comfortable dealing with the Joker. The line between murder and torture were delineated between Two Face and Batman. BatMan is a Republican who understands the Black Hat that justice sometimes has to take.... he tortures, but never takes a life. We need to get BatMan a job at Guatanomo. BatMan McCain for president!


The entire movie evolves from a delineation between "Two Face", "BatMan" and "The Joker". "Two Face" even in his human pre-identity never has the moral backbone that "BatMan" has (that is a given from the comic book). Harvey Dent tortures and is not afraid to kill. He makes that very clear and takes on the character of "Two Face" before he becomes "Two Face". BatMan corrects this action, but has no problem torturing the "Joker" when he is in jail. Therefor we can assume that "BatMan is not beyond torture, but will not take the death penalty into his own hands. One can assume that BatMan would understand Guantanamo... but would never kill because he is not due process. A government sanctioned war is part of due process. As for the Joker... he remains the terrorist... or even a "Super" Terrorist in that he would kill... even if he does not benefit. Remember Joker is not about the money and personal benefit. He BURNS the money. Joker wants to terrorize for the sake of terror because he is angry. He has no meaning at all. The Joker has no structure he believes in. One might even argue that the joker doesn't even care about his own life and takes destroying the establishment to be his first priority, He has Harvey Dent put his gun to his head to see if he can prove that Dent in no better then him. He laughs at BatMan to encourage him to break his own values and kill him.

trying to rationalize a purely objective social theory (*impossible*)... attempt to define evil over stupid.... and some how parallel that to a word that is obviously evolving? I see a lot of pain in this conversation... I get that you have been hurt, but I also see that your attempt to objectify a behavior that is reactionary as part of the symptoms that lead to others trolling. your analysis is part of the illness... your vanity has obviously been hurt and you are attempting to feel above and objectify a person who has made the dialog less about the subject you want then about the relationship within the community. No doubt that over a long term it can be a nuisance, but dissecting a behavior will not help as much as reaching out with love. Objectivity is to bring you to a better spirituality, you fail when you see yourself as being above trolling. You are about to fall like Harvey Dent /Two face. Friedrich Nietzsche said "if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.".

Cannibalism

Labels:

Obstructionist

Labels:

Accursed Share, The other part of Tikkun Olam, The Evil Question, Excess, Sacrifice, Book of Job

Labels:

Seesmic Thread http://seesmic.com/threads/gW2xxkWNpZ

Google+ Badge

Google+ Followers

Translate