is what gets to the heart of the argument. my father brought up
technology. what happens with 3d printers? Will the government be able
to stop the transfer of a blue print of a gun over the internet any
better then they can stop the transfer of music and video.
And then there’s Defense Distributed, a.k.a. the Wiki Weapon Project,
the initiative cooked up by a University of Texas Law student and some
of his buddies to 3-D print a working firearm.
The group’s Indiegogo funding campaign was shut down in the early going
and 3-D printer maker Stratasys revoked the lease on Wiki Weapon’s
fabricator at one point, but through Bitcoin and other technology
providers they’ve managed to keep the project alive and funded.
we saw the Defense Distributed boys out on the range, they were firing
an AR-15 rifle with a 3-D printed lower receiver--not of their own
design, but one that is already available out there on the Web. They
managed to get six rounds off
before the plastic component broke, but they learned a bit about recoil
and stress as they pertain to 3-D printed plastic in the process. These
guys seem pretty serious about bringing their own, freely distributed,
publicly available printable firearm design into being relatively soon,
which could make 2013 an interesting year in terms of ethics and legal
infrastructure that are scrambling to keep up with accelerating 3-D