Being and Time

Labels: »








Amanda Chapel; I thought she was gone?
I'm not getting a real life sex change.
I like being a guy in life.




Jean Baudrillard was explaining in "Symbolic Exchange and Death":
Power comes from the virtual.
I have no problem wearing the pants in life,
but I see benefit to the symbolism of being a woman.
I just want to be able to talk about sex online without being censored.
I'm tired of being wussy like Dr. Phil. I want to be dirty old crone like Dr. Ruth.
I see no benefit to being just a social butterfly.





I think if you were true to your art, you'd cut off your wiener.

Sincerely,

- Amanda Chapel


After realizing that Amanda Chapel was an alias for a group of people and not actually a woman, it dawned on me that the marketing possibilities for an entity that is perceived as being a female are different then an entity that is perceived as being male. I am conceiving of creating a female fake alias and I am curious as to your input on the pros and cons of a virtual sex changes. I have seen pages owned by women on facebook that seem to be plainly pornographic, because of their status as women they are not disabled. My artwork is not pornographic, but does deal with gender issues. After having three aliases destroyed by the facebook police, I feel that I can not safely be honest as a man. Many have said to me that I should stop using facebook if I don't like it. Being that faebook is an academic monopoly I do not have that option. There is no other place to have a dialogue, but I am not comfortable being a man on facebook any more, even though I am quite comfortable with my heterosexual lifestyle in life. I am busy creating a female identity. I have figured that facebook is using video these days. So I am going to have an actress voice all the random blips of responses that an alias would have to say if it were female. I do not believe it is a form of artificial intelligence in that I do not believe my female will have any intelligence at all. Just the way facebook wants it. I know it is a strange compromise, but I do not feel the precedent and law involved in social networking is fair to any extent. It seems OK for a female to be aggressive in making "friends", but threatening for a man to do so. I am very tired of the double standard. I am waiting for facebook to disable me and I will return as a cross dresser. I do hope you understand I am not changing myself... this is why I am sending this letter as a warning... I am changing my PR ability. I will not be leaving my real life girl, child or opinions. I am simply creating an identity to get my opinions out there. I look forward to hearing your ideas on this issue.




Click here and read my posted conversation about Hermaphroditus







I don't wish CENSORSHIP on my worst enemy

Labels: »

CLICK HERE for my arguments with facebook




CLICK HERE for yesterdays suspicion






BREAKING NEWS:
Woah! Change of heart. I don't wish CENSORSHIP on my worst enemy.

On 10/7/07, Amanda Chapel wrote:
> Noah,
>
> How did you get yourself reinstated in Facebook?
>
> We've also been suspended apparently.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Amanda Chapel
>
>

Ms. Chapel
I do not approve of anyone being censored here.
there is only one academic network controlled by one company.
I do not wish censorship on my worst enemy.
divergence of opinion in an academic forum is essential.
that is why it is important to keep dialogues going.

I never used drugs online, I never was naked and I never threatened anyone. I never broke the facebook "TERMS"... which seem to be pretty darn arbitrary. THIS IS THE DANGER OF ONE COMPANY CONTROLLING THE ACADEMIC NETWORK


They have gone too far


I said... I was against CENSORSHIP. and I meant it! That goes for Amanda Chapel or whatever.


first this Amanda I hate...
...next thing I know she's in the same place I am.
Something needs to be done. facebook needs to give people the ability to rate their pages and each post. I can't be responsible because I wake up one morning and decide to describe a bodily function on TWITTER because I'm in a bad mood.

I TWITTER everything that goes into my head... and I'm getting into the habit of it... I post things I wouldn't tell my own mother.
I'm not an extrovert.... I'm willing for people to hate me. I'm not running for office and no one will ever hurt me because I'm next door to the chief of police and the mayor of the town I live in. But they are going too far when they throw me off for breaking the "TERMS" and then don't describe what I infringed. It was probably my artwork.... and if an academic community had problems with it they shouldn't of given me a degree.

My Alumni email wasn't working this weekend suspiciously... and now it is working. It is as if they are looking into me... trying to see if they have anything... then they get paranoid and turned that off. Now it is working again.

Or maybe those PR agencies Chapel pissed off got to her.
This is quite frightening that people can just arbitrarily make an accusation and destroy your reputation. I have heard that the border police have access to your facebook and myspace account. I don't know if you know people in this arena... but something has to change. People can not be under surveillance like this. I really wish the Democrats would try to be reasonable. I am beginning to think I might have to vote for Hilary. I'm a Republican... but I think the Republicans think that Corporate Socialism is freedom. I really hate the Clintons too. A security state supported by high taxes is not what "Republicanism" is about. Republicans are for the Republic. Republicans support allies of their republic. Republicans are for policies that support the people. If the Democrats are for a feminist security state... something Rudy Giuliani was in league with when with Donna Hanover..., the Rupublicans seem to want a corporate and religious security state. The alarm bells are going off when I hear about security on it's own citizens. I'm not talking about not protecting the borders... I'm talking about our rights as citizens and our tax dollars going towards our own oppression. I don't want a feminist security state either. I don't want a security state. I don't want to spend the rest of my life within my own house being worried about if I say the wrong thing to the wrong girl. Sticks and Stones can hurt your bones, but names will never hurt you. You get that BITCH?


Enough is Enough





Two-facebook, here's my new face!--->


man who live in glass house dress in basement.--->


man who honest on facebook and twitter without firewalls unhappy.



CLICK HERE for my arguments with facebook


CLICK HERE for my suspicions with facebook

Propper nomenclature is Prostitute-American. Sorry I said Whore!

Labels:







CLICK HERE for the next CENSORSHIP EVENT











CLICK HERE for my arguments with facebook



BREAKING NEWS:
Woah! Change of heart. I don't wish CENSORSHIP on my worst enemy.








On 10/7/07, Amanda Chapel wrote:
> Noah,
> How did you get yourself reinstated in Facebook?
> We've also been suspended apparently.
> Regards,
> - Amanda Chapel

Ms. Chapel
I do not approve of anyone being censored here.
there is only one academic network controlled by one company.
I do not wish censorship on my worst enemy.
divergence of opinion in an academic forum is essential.
that is why it is important to keep dialogues going.








I never used drugs online, I never was naked and I never threatened anyone. I never broke the facebook "TERMS"... which seem to be pretty darn arbitrary. THIS IS THE DANGER OF ONE COMPANY CONTROLLING THE ACADEMIC NETWORK

They have gone too far

I said... I was against CENSORSHIP. and I meant it! That goes for Amanda Chapel or whatever.
enough is enough








this was yesterdays post where I attacked Strumpette aka Amanda Chapel

We aren't quite sure who shut down the "Noah David Simon" account on facebook... but we have our suspicions.
here is a quote from another Blog.


"Yep -- it's true.

Strumpette and presumably its "Web master" Brian Connolly have sent a letter to the executive director of the PRSA claiming the following:

I am being harassed by an accredited member of your organization ... Who on a national level could give me further information regarding the organizations position on this type of situation?

How do I know about the letter? Because Strumpette cc'ed me on it, of course.

This is not a new tactic. Strumpette enjoys attacking people, but prefers opponents who are unable to defend themselves. Strumpette and/or Brian have approached the employers of several bloggers who have criticized the Strumpette blog, trying to shut them up. In general, Strumpette's intimidation tactics have worked like a charm."



CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO

it might be a guy... hard to say. some blogs say it is four people.
but she goes by Amanda Chapel. I was making comments on her blog...
I am Pro-Israel and American and that offended her
....I think she claims to be from England. She hails to be from Chicago and had a write up in the Washington Post.

The last comment she said that I was "creepy"
I sent her a video comment asking if she was in highschool.
that only children call each other creepy when they disagree.

she disapeared because she could not respond on video because I believe I was talking to a man. It is a man who operates her blog. They work as a team. There is an actual Amanda Chapel.... but she is kind of like a Borg queen with people working below her. You feel like you are talking to a person... but you are not.

Last Night I got a comment saying

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "facebook and social networking censorship ":

"there's a reason that you were disabled -- you're fucking creepy. "

...at any rate it isn't just her... there is a contingent of people who are out to get me... mostly corporate feminist leftist fashion industry workers. I'm like Judas to them because I worked in the industry. It could be a contingent from my former employee of the very evil "BLACK BOOK" (crappy advertising resource that never distributed and I had the unfortunate honor of selling the worst advertising in history there)

Two-facebook, here's my new face!--->
man who live in glass house dress in basement.--->
man who honest on facebook and twitter without firewalls unhappy.


CLICK for my arguments with facebook


CLICK for my suspicions with facebook







facebook and social networking censorship

Labels:
BREAKING NEWS ON A RESPONSE:

(after waiting for a ten billion dollar company for 72 hours.......)






Maradi from Facebook
to noah
October 2nd 3:38 pm
Hi,

This problem should now be resolved. Sorry for any inconvenience, and enjoy the site! Let me
know if you have any further questions.

Thanks for contacting Facebook,

Maradi
Customer Support Representative
Facebook


Appeals from Facebook
to noah
Hi,
Action has been taken on your account, and Facebook Customer Support has received your inquiry. We will review your situation and get back to you as soon as possible.
Thanks for contacting Facebook.
-Facebook Customer Support


Information from Facebook
to noah
Hi,
Facebook Customer Support has received your inquiry. Stand by as we should be back with you soon. In the meantime, we encourage you to review our 'Help' page (http://www.facebook.com/help.php). You’ll find lots of information about Facebook as well as many answers to your questions. Check out the FAQs on our Support page too.
Thanks for contacting Facebook and enjoy the site!
-Facebook Customer Support


>>>>> On 10/1/07, Avery from Facebook wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It appears as though your account has not been hacked.  After
>>>>>> reviewing your situation, we have determined you violated our
>>>>>> Terms of Use.  Please note, nudity, drug use, or other obscene
>>>>>> content is not allowed on the website.  Additionally, we do not
>>>>>> allow users to send threatening, obscene, and harassing
>>>>>> messages.  Unsolicited messages will also not be tolerated. We
>>>>>> will not be able to reactivate your account for any reason.  This
>>>>>> decision is final.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for understanding,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Avery
>>>>>> Customer Support Representative
>>>>>> Facebook




Your policy says that you will use discretion. That would mean warning me privately before you pull my profile out of existence in front of 400 friends and business associates. You have not been discrete at all. You have revoked your own policy. If there was outrageous behavior, I should of been informed what is was before this public libel. Somehow I get the feeling that facebook is reacting emotionally. You are not objectively following policy. Further you are putting my community into hysteria, because you are making assumptions of personal nudity, drug use or physical threats. Please answer promptly! If there is a drug using naked person in my house that is physically threatening that I don't know anything about, it might be a good time to tell me.

On 10/1/07 11:54 PM, "Noah Simon" wrote:

>>>>> On 10/1/07, Avery from Facebook wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>>> It appears as though your account has not been hacked.
>
> "It appears my account was not hacked"? How would you know that?
> I DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT... AND IT IS MY ACCOUNT! Anyone could hack Anyone's
> account by simply knowing a password. ...with the allegations you made... I would hope a company of your size would
> have the very best people working on this situation.
> YOUR ARE PUTTING CHILDREN @ RISK BY NOT COMMUNICATING PROMPTLY
>
> On 10/1/07 11:46 PM, "Noah Simon" wrote:
>
>> Your making some libelous allegations. I expect a response from you.
>> Children could get hurt if what you are saying is true. Elaborate
>> immediately to protect the innocent people who could be harmed. Your irreverence to
>> other people's children will be noted if I do not get a prompt response. If what
>> you are claiming is true, then many children could be effected including my
>> son. I would hope that these allegations are not frivolous. If you are
>> serious about these allegations then I demand you go into details about what
>> you are saying.
>>
>> On 10/1/07 8:05 PM, "Noah Simon" wrote:
>>
>>> I expect a dialog. Not this cookie cutter response you are fabricating.
>>> Address the issues @ hand. Children could be hurt because of your
>>> irresponsibility. If there is a threat... We need to know about. If there
>>> was no threat.... Put the account back that way it was!
>>>
>>> On 10/1/07 8:02 PM, "Noah Simon" wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need better communication from you if you are going to continue with such
>>>> a drastic action. I need to know if there were any threats made on my
>>>> account.
>>>> The safety of my child is at issue. It is your responsibility to respond
>>>> promptly if there is a danger to children. When was a threat made and why
>>>> is there such discretion if there is such a danger? This censorship issue is
>>>> a slippery slope of morality, I see no reason for such a drastic move unless
>>>> there is a serious danger to other people. If there is a danger your
>>>> response
>>>> mechanism is unforgivable. My child could be hurt because of your
>>>> irresponsibility.
>>>>
>>>> I'm very worried about that pervert hacker who is showing himself naked,
>>>> taking drugs and making obscene comments. Please respond immediately. He
>>>> could hurt other children.
>>>>
>>>> If there is no threat,
>>>> We demand you reinstate the account of Noah David Simon
>>>>
>>>> For people who are making allegations of:
>>>>
>>>> "nudity, drug use, or other obscene content"
>>>>
>>>> I would expect a quicker response.... Children's lives could be hurt!
>>>> If I really were doing these things and I had my child online and it took
>>>> forty-eight hours for you to do something about it, I would take legal
>>>> action
>>>> against your company.
>>>>
>>>> PLEASE ELABORATE ON YOUR ACCUSATIONS!
>>>> Innocent children could be hurt.
>>>>
>>>> I am going to assume that I have been hacked. I find it hard to believe a
>>>> corporation of your size could be so irresponsible. I would hope facebook
>>>> does the right thing and elaborates on the details of what happened so that
>>>> we
>>>> can know if a third party like a "pervert" hacker was involved.
>>>>
>>>> I am very worried about the children who still believe in your company.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/1/07 3:14 PM, "Noah Simon" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "nudity, drug use, or other obscene
>>>>> content is not allowed on the website."
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) I don't use drugs... except maybe coffee
>>>>> 2) I was not nude... neither was anyone else
>>>>> 3) obscene content? Describe what you felt was obscene.
>>>>>
>>>>> ELABORATE PLEASE.... THESE ARE HUGE ALLEGATIONS YOU MAKE!
>>>>>
>>>>> your company is worth ten billion dollars and you don't have the ability
>>>>> to describe what obscene is to you? Jerry Falwell used to do it... and he
>>>>> was worth much less.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [noah@simonstudio.com - Fri Sep 28 14:17:32 2007]:
>>>>>> all I know is that it isn't just my facebook account.
>>>>>> my entourage is crashing....
>>>>>>   everything on my computer is haywire right now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please tell me what is going on.
>>>>>>      if there is a problem it would be best to tell me.
>>>>>>  I have problems with my computer on my end.

Google+ Badge

Google+ Followers

Translate