via daylife.com
London's Al Quds quotes Jimmy Carter as calling for Israel to withdraw from "East Jerusalem", saying it must become the capital of a Palestinian Arab state.
AFP quotes him as saying, "We will continue to work on a peaceful solution where the Israelis will withdraw from east Jerusalem and let this be the capital of a Palestinian state."
Arab interest in Jerusalem was practically nil before the anti-semitic Mufti in the 1920s started politicizing the issue, and then it faded from Muslim and Arab consciousness for the 19 years of Jordanian rule when the Palestinian Arab national cause was all but mute.
Arab interest in Jerusalem is directly proportional to Jewish political rule over the city. It is not inherent; it is derivative. It was never set up as a positive goal but rather a negative one - they didn't want to establish Jerusalem as an Arab capital, but to deprive Jews of establishing it as theirs.
Nowhere was this clearer than in 1949, when almost the entire Arab world appealed to the UN to make Jerusalem an international city - and expel all Jews who moved there since 1947: |
|
If Tel Aviv must
be Israel's capital
according to the
entire world,
why can Ramallah
not be the
Palestinian
Arab capital?
|
Recently Jimmy Carter
called Israel
an Apartheid,
(something which Israel
is not and Carter knew)
but after apologizing
now Carter
is demanding
to make a separation
where no Jew can go..
Why is he demanding
to create
a Jew free area
when Israel
does not have an
Arab free area?
The only thing that is
consistent
is the man's hate.
What makes Carter
different then
Mel Gibson's cycle
of apologies?
Nothing! |