Showing posts with label GayMarriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GayMarriage. Show all posts

Political Correction was the creation of gay thinkers who supported totalitarian fascists

Labels: » » » »
I know I'm going to be called a homophobe, but the feminist CamillePaglia agrees with me. the liberals use Hitler's philosopher to justify censorship for those who oppose gay marriage... and they use a gay French philosopher (Foucault) who enabled Shia Islam. The basic idea is that truth needs to be revealed through meaning and that the sum of the parts (penis and vagina) don't give the final meaning because of sheer will.
Heidegger's Opinion on Gay Marriage
....Heidegger's notion of "worldhood." What is so compelling is the idea that, as humans (as what Heidegger calls Dasein), we do not live in a world where we start with bare facts and then build meaning from them. We do not construct our world from the flotsam of objects, whether those objects be rocks and trees, tools and buildings, or even words and ideas. Rather, we live first and foremost in meaning, inside of meaning. A world is not a geographical locale or a collection of people and things. It is rather that within which our actions can have meaning... 
Whatever... nonsense... Hitler's philosopher. Meaning becomes detached from reality ...so the reality Martin Heidegger ignores because the meaning is hidden... therefor we blind ourselves of anything that offends us? ...Fascists


Marriage Equality: Federal Judge Strikes Down Polygamy Ban Based on Gay Rights

Labels: » » »

(CBS) Advocacy groups for polygamy and individual liberties on Saturday hailed a federal judge's ruling that key parts of Utah's polygamy laws are unconstitutional, saying it will remove the threat of arrest for those families.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups said in the decision handed down Friday that a provision in Utah law forbidding cohabitation with another person violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees basic rights, including freedom of religion.
(Knish) If we’re not going to have any standards for marriage except “People in a relationship of some kind” then there’s no reason not to recognize polygamy. Or any of the crazier stuff coming down the pike. And that was why the left pushed the gay marriage scam to begin with.
The legalization of polygamy followed logically from the legal arguments against one man-one woman, as was predicted not just by me, but also by Professor Martha Nussbaum, one of the leading legal advocates for gay marriage, “Polygamy would have to be permitted.”
A U.S. District Court judge has sided with the polgyamous Brown family, ruling that key parts of Utah’s polygamy laws are unconstitutional.
Judge Clark Waddoups’ 91-page ruling, issued Friday, sets a new legal precedent in Utah, effectively decriminalizing polygamy.
(KnishAnd the argument for striking down a polygamy ban? Modernity. Of course. We’re all so modern now that we know marriage is no longer between a man and a woman. It can be between anything and anything. A man and a man. A man and three women. A man and a tree.
“To state the obvious,” Judge Waddoups wrote, “the intervening years have witnessed a significant strengthening of numerous provisions of the Bill of Rights.” They include, he wrote, enhancements of the right to privacy and a shift in the Supreme Court’s posture “that is less inclined to allow majoritarian coercion of unpopular or disliked minority groups,” especially when “religious prejudice,” racism or “some other constitutionally suspect motivation can be discovered behind such legislation.”
The judge cited the decision in Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 Supreme Court case that struck down laws prohibiting sodomy. He quoted the majority opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy that stated the Constitution protects people from “unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places” and “an autonomy of self that includes freedom of thought, belief, expression and certain intimate conduct.”
As same-sex marriage has gained popular approval and legal status in recent years, some have hoped — and some feared — that other forms of cohabitation might follow. Justice Antonin Scalia, in his bitter and famous dissent from the 2003 Lawrence case, said the nation was on the verge of the end of legislation based on morality, and was opening the door to legalizing “bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity.”
Just like Cass Sunstein and Samantha Power wanted

Nipple Twisting

Labels: »
you making child payments yet? know any gays that knocked up their wives? WAKE UP. it isn't constitutional. infidelity is a breach of contract. gay marriage is nothing but punitive anger. I'd sooner be skeptical of w4 tax forms then a marriage contract... and yet marriage is what the online tyrants are snarky about. a voting Democracy is right on this one. not one election won by the beauty pageant bullies. sadly the gay community will eventually understand that they need their own contracts to protect their own needs. till that time we will protect society from arbitrary abuse of the left. the Prop8 protesters are more hypocritical then a San Francisco politician on a Gitmo briefing. aren't honest about the nipple twisting that you knew about? well you can troll online because if you go public people will tear you a second asshole like Nancy Pilosi. Gay Marriage just isn't transparent. we need honesty. not lies. in related news: "'Gay' gene claim suddenly vanishes " no inherantly "Gay" people according to the American Psychological Association http://ff.im/2RAgp woman like PreJean get ahead without controversy. it was admirable of her. we live in a dangerous culture of parasites playing at slippery slopes. everything is debatable. Israel is just one argument away from over. people should be snarky at other documents besides marriage. marriage protects people because it reflects their relationship. it is transparent because it is reflective. true transparency reflects at certain angles and allows you to see through it at others. men have to pay child support. women can get pregnant. this is something the government needs to address. you can not grant rights by taking authentic dignity away. PreJean might not understand this and takes her opinions on faith (which I respect)... but there are very good reasons why religion is against "Gay Marriage". We have become so sarcastic as a society that we have forgotten to analyze what institution the angry pitchfork mobs are attempting to tear down.












Gay Marriage

Labels: »


first Iowa and now Vermont. smug elitists are farting away in their little cabals eh? I don't have a choice... when I have sex I live in danger of financial obligation and yet the government of Vermont just gave the same tax credit to those that don't live with that danger. the people will overturn this just like California. how very closed minded to not consider the rights of children when regarding the need for transparent social contracts. It is a sad day in America and a sad day for truth and honesty. I want a law and government that reflects truth... not a lie that a marriage is a business agreement.. truth is that marriage is to protect children and establish an ideal living condition. It is the duty of a government to acknowledge difference and this moment in history says we are all the same for the cookie cutter monoculture. this is not equality. this is hate when you can't respect people's unique talent. It is disrespectful to our biology... it is disrespectful to people who can't control their biology. legislative choice should never be about taking rights away from others. the end result is more children without opportunities because social contracts designed to help our society have become meaningless in the name of disrespecting difference. you can't create a child without a man. and a man's identity is to be respected as critically part of a balanced ecosystem. NO MORE SOCIAL ENGINEERING. you can't control forces you can not understand. a marriage is a social contract that is reflective of us. this is exactly as it should be. I don't want government legislation that does not represent me. Gay Marriage is to allow a legislative lie. I'm not against government if it is elegantly designed... but if it reflects convenient lies then it becomes a huge problem.

Conversation with Heather "Milk?" Gold

Labels: »
on facebook
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=896575156&v=feed&story_fbid=63690810378

Heather RT Last wk judge ruled that YesOn8 donors must be made public. Names were released today! http://bit.ly/1488O & http://bit.ly/ByRl (list).via Twitter - 3:33pm - Comment

 
Noah David Simon at 1:20am February 3
Big Brother is Gay?

Heather Milk Gold at 5:09pm February 3
Nothing big brother-y at all about having transparency with political contributions. Partnof democracy. Donations to *all* campaigns are public including no on 8's.

In order to be "Big Brother" one would have to be anonymous (all no on 8/pro gay marriage orgs and donors are public) and in power (we lost. Gay peeps have least legal standing/power/rights in the nation).

 
Noah David Simon at 8:36pm February 3
that is about as balanced as Ron Paul isolationist statement and it sounds like something Joseph McCarthy would say. all for the transparency. great... I'm for nudity on all beaches. I don't want any bitching about Cellulite. come now... we all know about the Prop8 blacklisting going on. lame!

Heather Milk Gold at 1:18pm February 4
You think political donations should always be secret? Transparency is the issue the court ruled on and one that I support 100%.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:32pm February 4
now you want to reveal and black list people who are fighting your hate. your transparency is glaringly arbitrary as is your concept of social contracts. "Gay Marriage" is terribly un-transparent in that it does not reflect the biological truth that you have no dangers with pregnancy. you are taking government support away from people burdened with pregnancy because of hate and bigotry and I do not approve of it. what is good for the geese is good for the gander or whatever the in-between label they have for gay birds is. I can't wait to get the Pilosi people out of power.

Heather Milk Gold at 1:36pm February 4
Dude, I have never said a thing about black listing. I'm really not sure what you're talking about. "Taking government support away from.." ? I didn't write anything like that. I said I'm glad the court decided the donors to the campaigns have to be public. btw, I'm in the process of planning pregnancy right now.

And I live in Pelosi's district and didn't vote for her. You've made a whole lot of assumptions there.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:38pm February 4
yeah I know about the Pelosi alternative too. even worse. don't know about the blacklisting? come now!

Heather Milk Gold at 1:42pm February 4
Unclear from your notes. Do you support my legal equality and right to marry or no?

Heather Milk Gold at 1:42pm February 4
Legally speaking, that is. We're already married and that's not really up to anyone else.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:43pm February 4
here is some info from google for the Sheehan haters http://www.google.com/sear

ch?hl=en&safe=off&client=s

afari&rls=yi&pwst=1&sa=X&o

i=spell&resnum=1&ct=result

&cd=1&q=prop+8+blacklist&s

pell=1

Heather Milk Gold at 1:43pm February 4
I don't hate anyone, btw.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:45pm February 4
I support your right to do whatever you want as long as you don't hurt other people. taking away social contract that are honest and reflect the reality on the ground is bigotry and hate and I will not allow it. you can apply for the same benefits once you adopt and not before. It would be unfair to children and parents otherwise.

Heather Milk Gold at 1:47pm February 4
My focus is on equalitycamp.com and doing everything I can to build our movement by reaching out to people one on one.

But if people want to choose another hotel instead of Marriott, that doesn't bother me. That's choice.

The way we will eventually win our legal rights is reaching out to people and finding common ground. But also not accepting poor treatment.

I hope the Mormon Church will stand behind its statements that it supports some rights for gay couples and individuals. I know Equality Utah is working on a Common Ground law and has taken out ads asking the Mormon Church to work with it.

Heather Milk Gold at 1:50pm February 4
Where have you read me say that I want to take away a right from anyone?

I'm going to give birth, so I won't be adopting. NY State law already states both my wife and I will be on the birth certificate for the child. I don't see how our having a family harms anyone. on the contrary, it invests us in working harder for family protections for all.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:56pm February 4
I support your right to do whatever you want... but when you are talking about a legal contract you are talking about "meaning" that applies to a real situation. giving privileges to those that don't need it is not an attribute our government should aspire to. a marriage means something. It has a civil meaning that the Prop8 blacklisters do not respect. Obviously this is not just an absolutist strict constitutional argument either. I believe there is enough hate and violence coming from the gay community that I have experienced first hand that I can say that this is by no means a theoretical argument. I could get into the details of my experiences in NYC when my son was born four years ago... but I'd rather not. This goes beyond legalities and reflects a reality where I do not believe "Gay Marriage" is about equality at all.

 
Noah David Simon at 1:57pm February 4
you chose to have the child. straight people don't have that choice. a legal contract should reflect that.

Heather Milk Gold at 2:04pm February 4
I am gay and married. I agree that marriage means something. That's why we're married. It is a real situation.

Stacey and I don't have the same tax benefits as straight marriages in most of the country. We don't have the right to visit each other in the hospital in most of the country. We aren't recognized as family when we cross the border traveling together. Many gay couples can't stay together if one is from another country (I am but was able to naturalize and become American). All of these things we need. We take care of each other are committed to each other and deserve all the same recognition of that.

You don't seem to be talking to me about my words or experience but something you've decided on the basis of your experiences with others. I know lots of other Jewish men but I don't imagine everything they did or said is the same as what you would do or say.

Straight folks absolutely choose to have children. Every child born is not an accident.

 
Noah David Simon at 2:10pm February 4
no. I don't only make arguments on theory and logic when arguing hate. that is a given. I only want your social contract to reflect the reality of your situation and not reflect a lie. Is the Gloria Steinem one size fits all part of your feminism 2.0?


Heather Milk Gold at 2:58pm February 4
I honestly do not understand the points you are making. My marriage and our commitment and life needs are all real. We need protection so that our children cannot be taken away from us in other states and so that we are both recognized as our children's parents. That is the reality I'm doing my best to plan for given the drastic legal inequality in many parts of US.

We cannot receive social security and other benefits for each other etc. We will be spending our lives together. That's our reality. Do we have spousal immunity in courts of law? These and many other questions generally leave us unprotected until the law is amended.

 
Noah David Simon at 3:07pm February 4
when you respect my right,... and the reality I deal with (where pregnancy is not an option it is part of life that happens in unwanted circumstances. Abortion is not a healthy option and it is proven to be that even if you think it is a moral thing)... perhaps then you will see what you are talking about is just more blacklisting and hate. you ask for respect, but you give none. your legal status is like Palestine's. it will be DENIED, till it is safe for the other party who is threatened. You can violently reject my rights... or you can acknowledge your situation. the fact that you voted for Sheehan doesn't leave me with much confidence in your understanding of an existential situation.


Heather Milk Gold at 3:19pm February 4
1. You don't know who I voted for and it wasn't Sheehan.

2. What have I done that you feel is violent to you?

3. How are you unsafe? How, specifically am i making you unsafe? I desire safety for everyone. That includes you.

Noah David Simon at 4:08pm February 4
you had not corrected me, and I know Sheehan was a major opposition to Pelosi. I brought it up above.

violence would be attempting to take my rights to special government support away for your theoretical needs that you can chose to burden yourself. I've experienced tremendous hostility from the "Gay" community in NYC. I've lost my job at "The Black Book" due to this exact issue partly. The man I worked next to was gay and while I showed him nothing but tolerance, he showed nothing but contempt, which is ironic because I was one of the few heterosexual males that didn't contempt people for sexual lifestyles at that company. I've had a $4000 PowerBook destroyed at Starbucks merely for questioning this issue. I do not feel safe. I understand your community has been burdened by bigotry, but you are giving off nothing but that hate. This is not theory. This is real. I sympathize with your situation, but your community is not compromising on taking away straight people's rights

Noah David Simon at 4:25pm February 4
compound this to a NYC environment where people were telling me I should have to get a license to procreate? how about the "breeder" jokes. if it weren't real I wouldn't be involved. The law will evolve when the hatred is put away, but I assure you that marriage is a civil contract that needs to reflect people, not the theory that you can chose to go to a sperm bank. where is my choice? this is some affirmative action you will not get from me. my rights will not be compromised by your hypothetical mono culture.

Heather Milk Gold at 5:21pm February 4
Overall it sounds like you've had some bad experiences with other people (none of which are me). So I'm not sure why you assume I believe or support things that others may have that you feel hurt you.

One thing at a time here so I can handle it:

"violence would be attempting to take my rights to special government support away"

What are you your rights to special gov't support ? I don't know what this is. I don't advocate you losing any rights whatsoever, and no gay equality or gay marriage group I'm aware of does either.

Noah David Simon at 6:14pm February 4
there are violent economic ramifications in California and New York. To deny this is silly and you would have to be pretty smug to pretend the social networking "blocks" haven't gone haywire over this issue.

Noah David Simon at 6:44pm February 4
to be supported in "hetero" needs are the government institutions I ask for and we get this through "marriage". Marriage is a convention and social contract you want to water down with people that don't have the situation where they are facing a reality where they face no choice.... which you have. the violence comes from your inability to realize that there is a real threat from your community to people that speak out or finance Prop8... especially in places where the Gay Community is powerful. it is violence to ignore that reality... I have faced it first hand. there is also smug lack of respect that I am feeling. The first part of respecting difference is in respecting my difference. which you and the gay community have not. you are denying a real violence. economic and physical. try being a young poor single straight male in an urban gay community and try renting an apartment. try socializing outside the "Republican" community onlline and meet the Scoble fascists. bigotry

Gay Wedding

Labels: »












Baby Want Boobies

Labels: »

Gay Marriage

Labels: »
my laptop was destroyed by2lesbians at Starbucks cuz wouldn't support gay marriage n told it2they're face







http://delicious.com/simonstudio/gay


friendfeed link to arguments
http://friendfeed.com/e/4b9052cb-2369-4551-b982-c7b18e938113/Class-surprises-lesbian-teacher-on-wedding/


related video" Draw The Line "
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Draw_the_Line


Check out this interesting answer on Yedda


A lesbian ridiculed me for voting 4 Romney because ...

The first part of respecting difference is respecting difference!

the whole point of making life easier for people who are married is to encourage children growing up in a positive healthy environment (and no one is saying a gay person can't create a positive environment). What I am saying is straight women deserve an identity recognized by the government that recognizes they're unique child bearing situation and they're inability to avoid that truth. Marriage is a recognition of responsibility for they're gift. Gay people are not gifted in that way... simple as that. If gay folk or unmarried straight folk want to adopt, then they should be able to apply for tax recognition.

Besides not recognizing the unique identity of women, gay marriage is also a snub to straight single people. if gay people can receive the tax benefits of married couples then I demand the same ones for starters.









Topics: , , , , , , , , , ,

Answered by SimonStudio on March 15, 2008

View the entire discussion on YeddaYedda – People. Sharing. Knowledge.





Translate