Ron Paul kicked off YAF board

It's a sad day in American history when a one-time conservative/libertarian stalwart has fallen more out of touch with America's needs for national security then our current socialist presidential regime, said Young Americans For Freedom national director Jordan Marks.

-  Politico

The dispute between Paul and the the group seems to stem from Paul's anti-war activities and the prominence of his supporters at conservative events like CPAC.
"Rep. Paul is clearly off his meds and must be purged from public office. YAF is starting the process by removing him from our national advisory board. Good riddance and he won't be missed," added Marks.  via americanthinker.com

listen to this Paulbot go at anyone who criticizes his guru. btw... there were WMDS in Iraq... saying that there weren't won't change the truth. Or was Saddam not a CIA operative?  yeeehah the truth comes out. It is a no brainer, but the segment bite of no WMDs registers with the sheep. Even Noam Chomsky said there were WMDs because we gave it to them.

blaming America - and Israel - for most of the evils in the world. It didn't fly in 2008 and it will be even less popular in 2012 if Ron Paul were to embarrass himself and run for president again.

via americanthinker.com

the problem with guys like Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul... (who are really one and the same internationalist agenda... one for corporatist internationalism and the other for socialist internationalism) is that it doesn't matter what they say. They hurt the reputation of the average American and they don't represent local interests.

The modern debate over government is based on offering Americans a choice between two minority monopolies of power. Government controlled corporations or corporate controlled government. Two extremes, both of which monopolize power in the hands of a small number of powerful and influential people. And deprive ordinary citizens of their rights. Because a tyranny of the minority is still a tyranny-- regardless of what its guise is. And either corporate controlled government or government controlled corporations mean a totalitarian state serving the interests of a small group. The only debate is over which small group will benefit the most from the oppression of the majority.

The debate between government controlled corporations and corporate controlled government is mostly irrelevant. Because we have both.

via sultanknish.blogspot.com

...and Here is Noam Chomsky on WMDs. I know he is a liar, but even he does not agree with the idea that there were no WMDs

Chomsky: "This is even sometimes discussed. You can find it in the strategic analysis literature. Take, say, the invasion of Iraq again. We're told that they didn't find weapons of mass destruction. Well, that's not exactly correct. They did find weapons of mass destruction, namely, the ones that had been sent to Saddam by the United States, Britain, and others through the 1980s. A lot of them were still there. They were under control of U.N. inspectors and were being dismantled. But many were still there. When the U.S. invaded, the inspectors were kicked out, and Rumsfeld and Cheney didn't tell their troops to guard the sites. So the sites were left unguarded, and they were systematically looted. The U.N. inspectors did continue their work by satellite and they identified over 100 sites that were systematically looted, like, not somebody going in and stealing something, but carefully, systematically looted." via Chomsky info