Peace can only come as a result of the terrorists' unconditional surrender

Labels: » » » »
A ridiculous statement from Meretz's Zehava Gal-On.
MK Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz), Meretz Knesset candidate Michal Rosin and Meretz leader Zehava Gal-On gathered under a staircase in Meretz MK Ilan Gilon's home Monday, after a siren went off during an anti-war forum hosted by the party and attended by residents of the south.
Gal-On said that true security can only come as a result of a negotiated agreement, and a land incursion can "trap Israel in the Gazan mud and bring a high price in human lives." 
Really? Do we have 'true security' with the Islamist regime in Egypt thirty years after Camp David? Do we have 'true security' with Jordan 18 years after we signed a treaty with them, and will we still have it if the Muslim Brotherhood replaces the house of Hussein? Do we have 'true security' with the 'Palestinian Authority' 19 years after Yitzchak Rabin stood on the White House lawn with Yasser Arafat and Bill Clinton?
No. We have security with none of them. All of them would like to wipe us out, and would do so in a New York minute if they are ever - God forbid - given the opportunity.
Does France have security from Germany today? Does England? Does Belgium?
Does South Korea have security from Japan today? Does Russia? Does the Phillipines?
What's the difference? The difference that World War II was fought until there was a winner and a loser. The winners have security. The losers surrendered.
We will have security - and therefore peace - when we trust in God enough to fight the Arab terrorists to the finish. When they see they cannot defeat us, we will have both peace and security. When we come cowering for peace because we are tired of fighting, we will have neither peace nor security.
True security as a result of a negotiated agreement? Name me one time in history that it's happened. 

Translate