Flotilla Revisionism

Labels:
The Times apparently views any statement made by Israel or its supporters to be false until proven true beyond its ability to think up some excuse for not accepting it. After Israel released several videos showing Israeli soldiers arriving on the deck of the Mavi Marmara and being beaten by a large mob, it dismissed the footage as … “lacking context. Were they [the images] shot before or after the boarding party started using force?”

http://xrl.us/FlotillaFail  http://xrl.us/Flotilla
Yet one can clearly see on the video that the militants on the ship’s deck are calmly standing there, obviously not being fired upon, and the soldiers are holding onto the rope, with their guns slung over their shoulders.
Forced to retreat a bit — but never acknowledging its error — the Times editorialized: “The Israelis claim that Insani Yardim Vakfi is a dangerous organization with terrorist links. They have yet to offer any evidence to support that charge.”
But, of course, a vast amount of evidence had been released, including: documents showing the organization had been declared to have such links by, among other entities, the Danish government, France’s leading counterterrorism magistrate, a previous Turkish government, and the U.S. government.
All documents are easily available on the internet, but beyond the reach of the Times, apparently.
quoted from Barry Rubin via pajamasmedia.com

I keep on hearing from Arabists that they have their own sources that leave them to believe otherwise concerning the Mavi Marmara.  I have not seen these sources yet.  Perhaps they were referring to the doctored Reuters photos?  What is the argument?  I'm sure they will come up with one... I'm still waiting.  They did it to the WTC on 911... I'm sure they have experts working on a revision right now.

Translate