60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don't have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action. We idolize Asia's strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia's strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I'm not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school's ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Now feminist accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men. they have no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men's jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women: social services, education, health, childcare and welfare have actually gained jobs during this recession. The feminists demanded half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists conspired to achieve this by pushing the stimulus funds into jobs where women predominate and by moving at least one third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for men's jobs.
porn is what is considered obscene. you can have willing porn. don't believe the 70s and Gloria Steinem. all those experiments were lacking the proper axioms for truth. I've read the book by David copp and Susan Wendell. they aren't objective stats at all. did you read the post feminist article in the NYTimes last month. pretty much throws all those lies out. most of the stats that claim the mental distress from porn is based on the idea that it causes pain in both genders. that is a lie. it is relaxing to many. it causes a loss of status for women... but soap operas do the same to men. the final finding from those Copp/Wendell studies were based on levels of aggression towards women. it also claims that women also feel aggressive to other women from watching porn. but what it fails to mention is the cause of the female aggression is different then the cause of male. men might be more likely to be dominant after watching a display of this... but the aggression that women feel is their vanity busted. it is true that viewing domination causes the audience to be dominant, but it is also true that to not be appreciated for your traits causes feelings of anger. should I not appreciate a women's beauty? because of this androgyny causes negative violence. masculine domination on the other hand can be liberating for heterosexuals
