SiliconFilter :: Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a German technology activist and former spokesperson for whistleblower organization WikiLeaks, announced today that he has destroyed over 3,500 unpublished documents that used to sit on WikiLeaks servers until he and others left the organization and took the data with them in late 2010. According to a report by German newsmagazine Der Spiegel (Google Translate), which interviewed Domscheit-Berg, this data includes, among many others, a copy of the no fly list kept by the U.S. government, five gigabytes from the Bank of America and US intercept arrangements for over 100 internet companies. Details - continue to read Frederic Lardinois, siliconfilter.com via @StKonrath nextlevelofnews.com
In a statement,
WikiLeaks argues that it tried to negotiate with Domscheit-Berg and that
he has “repeatedly attempted to blackmail WikiLeaks by threatening to
make available, to forces that oppose WikiLeaks, these private
communications [the unpublished documents] and to which Mr.
Domscheit-Berg is not a party.”
WikiLeaks is also trying to distance itself from Domscheit-Berg and
argues that his “roles within WikiLeaks were limited and started to
diminish almost a year ago as his integrity and stability were
questioned. […] He is not a founder or co-founder and nor was there any
contact with him during the founding years. He did not even have an
email address with the organization until 2008 (we launched in December
2006). He cannot program and wrote not a single program for the
organization, at any time.”The relationship between Domscheit-Berg and Assange has been rather contemptuous for a while now. After leaving the organization, the German activist also wrote a book about his experience with WikiLeaks and Assange in particular. In it, he does not paint a very favorable picture of Assange. In addition, he also founded a competing whistleblower platform OpenLeaks, which went public last week. OpenLeaks, which plans to make its platform available to newspaper and other organizations, however, did not have a very smooth launch and was heavily criticized by a number of Wikileaks activists.
