"Pope Urban II and Pope Innocent III granted indulgence to all future Crusaders (martyrs of the Church)"and that
"Crusading is not just a right, but a duty according to Canon Law."Ironically, he uses Christianity in exactly the same way Muslims use Islam to justify terror, even using legal language - almost like a Christian version of a fatwa. Beyond that, he justifies his sins (such as visiting prostitutes) in order to keep his mood up for the upcoming attack, reasoning that the ends justify the means. more via Elder of Ziyon
My father says I'm a Jew that has the sensibility and cultural sense of Christian. I'm Pro Life and against Gay Marriage, but this Christian named Anders Behring Breivik has the sensibility of a Muslim. He even visits whores before the attack. I wouldn't indulge any labels. Religious and political schisms are not in his psyche. I get the feeling that many bloggers are trying to respond to accusations that the "Elder's" politics were somehow at fault. I wouldn't worry about it. I also saw Pamela Geller tweeting about how Charles Johnson got mentioned more then she did... so therefor she is less guilty? I've never seen on any Anti-Jihad blog, any attempt to promote a violent crusade within a Western country. It is a silly time for bloggers to worry about who is more responsible... when none are. BTW... it is a silly time to bring up LGF. I'd post this on Pamela's blog... but it just came up while I was typing this text on Elder's post that I am Reblogging.
Read More of Anders' Manifesto