Maddow Flat Out Lies About Standard and Poor’s Downgrade Explanation: 'Not Because There's Too Much Debt' ?
Labels:
credit rating»
debt»
Debt Ceiling»
Maddow»
Standard and Poor’s
I differ with Newsbuster and Maddow. The S and P most
certainly is pointing fingers at our leader's inability to cooperate.
This does not mean the S and P is right about that analysis. Trust
me... I'm not biased... these are the words I see... and I don't
particularly like Maddow... though she is showing once again that even
though I don't like her politics or her snide attitude, she is a very
effective debator and certainly is denying a correlative to skew the
truth. The denied correlative is that the S and P is full of SH*T!
Here is what Newsbuster quotes from the S&P:
· We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
· We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative.
· The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.
· More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
· Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.
· The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
via newsbusters.org
